Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71188 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2009 07:34:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2009 07:34:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 25087 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2009 07:34:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 25003 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2009 07:34:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 24993 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2009 07:34:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 07:34:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.68.94.123] (HELO tumbolia.org) (80.68.94.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 07:34:46 +0000 Received: from nslater by tumbolia.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MZJy5-0004AZ-Ly for dev@couchdb.apache.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:34:25 +0100 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:34:25 +0100 From: Noah Slater To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: Uneasiness with use of github for experimentation Message-ID: <20090807073425.GD14198@tumbolia.org> Mail-Followup-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org References: <399A2534-FBBB-4D0E-A7C9-A04AB0E175BA@apache.org> <96A8267B-72C4-473F-A78A-B8C665805D4A@gmail.com> <20090806220550.GA25455@tumbolia.org> <13B4F2C2-C0DE-4C9F-BEFF-DB8ABBE301B0@apache.org> <20090807063031.GB14198@tumbolia.org> <20090807065319.GC14198@tumbolia.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Noah: Awesome User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 09:29:15AM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > Not a committer, but I think recent versions of Bugzilla (e.g. the 3.2 > or 3.4 range) are substantially improved from the old 2.18/2.20 crap > everyone is used to hating on. Hmm, sounds good. > I usually prefer Trac myself, because it gets you bug tracker, wiki > and repo tracking in one relatively neat little package, but that may > not be useful at the ASF, where all of these services are provided for > separately. (Admittedly, the Trac UI has gone a little stale, but I > still find it alright. Haven't used Redmine or Lighthouse or whatever > much, though.) Ayeup, I use Trac for company projects. One of our committers is a Trac developer too! Heh. Best, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater