From dev-return-5467-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Mon Aug 03 17:43:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8155 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2009 17:43:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2009 17:43:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 11650 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 17:44:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 11549 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 17:44:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 11539 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2009 17:44:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:44:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.97.50.139] (HELO jan.prima.de) (83.97.50.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:43:49 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.14] (f053005045.adsl.alicedsl.de [::ffff:78.53.5.45]) (AUTH: LOGIN jan, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by jan.prima.de with esmtp; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:43:28 +0000 Message-Id: From: Jan Lehnardt To: dev@couchdb.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: POST with _id Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:43:27 +0200 References: <42E1E336-66E6-4A26-AFB2-2C92D4BF564C@apache.org> <20090803155112.GA13646@uk.tiscali.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3 Aug 2009, at 19:37, Paul Davis wrote: > Either way, perhaps we should poll the community and see what the > general consensus would be for respecting an _id or _rev in the POST > body? =93Be strict in what you send, but generous in what you receive=94 =97 = The =20 Internets Cheers Jan --