Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72525 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 16:05:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 16:05:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 81274 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 16:05:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 81215 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2009 16:05:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 81205 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2009 16:05:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:05:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of djc.ochtman@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.225] (HELO mail-gx0-f225.google.com) (209.85.217.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:05:08 +0000 Received: by gxk25 with SMTP id 25so3965073gxk.11 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:04:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FCwG4W548De8whx3gLYJ4veCB879ws/hQr4v3KYzKRY=; b=GVWZBLqwzAroFB/fx3/IOn7q4lC6NRGUeUPMZCSSVPvBKSEaZrV7yJGOQkikCAtUk3 pZFQ2vkCCT2bFiFfcGroBm/9P0LA6eTQW5JAjy54kqKCqkHw71RLaFaSYe9L1zr9wFI+ STLCJXd3uDYuKrVvPI5gKCuM4RqdML2K1bTxo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=DiY2gZbGgHaXfgYXfJrpltXAVEqyi8hGePCn+AUBHZIxPCgMe26llwsPS3DXTvxqes YEPpxHCbA5PYtjuO/7agZVXBjA1i8FpP07Ycm/8yK0jnfLFEQKlkH255xetN/Kbxkcap pw7TXrgYYfs3uDHWW2VbjMiAhBpnZD1iZFGOA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: djc.ochtman@gmail.com Received: by 10.151.6.19 with SMTP id j19mr12772296ybi.183.1247673887426; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:04:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <467DF120-D9E6-4D43-99B0-E643605555C3@apache.org> References: <467DF120-D9E6-4D43-99B0-E643605555C3@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:04:47 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 09f7847fca760178 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RIP Temp Views? From: Dirkjan Ochtman To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 17:57, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > If you like temp views, I'd like to take your concerns into consideration. I like testing out views from Futon, but it seems you're going to keep that anyway. I wonder if keeping a somewhat-compatible copy of the Couch API in JS isn't expensive in terms of developer time, but otherwise the proposal (from skimming) sounds good to me. Cheers, Dirkjan