Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34381 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2009 17:48:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2009 17:48:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 35306 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 17:48:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 35238 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2009 17:48:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 35228 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2009 17:48:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:48:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.68.94.123] (HELO tumbolia.org) (80.68.94.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:48:37 +0000 Received: from nslater by tumbolia.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ME5Qm-0005GW-U6 for dev@couchdb.apache.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:48:16 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:48:16 +0100 From: Noah Slater To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: OTP-ification Message-ID: <20090609174816.GD19605@tumbolia.org> Mail-Followup-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Noah: Awesome User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:26:49PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > Still, I don't think we want to bundle multiple applications unless we're > > prepared to distribute them separately. > > I disagree on this one. The multiple application aspect should be purely for > internal organization and not as some indication that we're going to > distribute bits and pieces separately. Ie, its not like people are expecting > us to make mochiweb and ibrowse distributions and what not. I agree with you Paul. This is a nice way to force us to confront code and dependency organisation. Best, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater