couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Anderson <jch...@apache.org>
Subject Re: stats test failure (was Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.1 release)
Date Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:36:08 GMT
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Adam Kocoloski<adam.kocoloski@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, it was the 0.9.1 tarball that failed for me.
>
> The fix is as easy as disabling the test, so if we're going to do anything I
> think we might as well fix it. Cheers,
>

+1 on backporting a fix, since it's so simple.

> Adam
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 29, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Chris Anderson <jchris@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Adam Kocoloski<kocolosk@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Wojciech Kaczmarek wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 14:51, <mickael.bailly@free.fr> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> got an error on the testsuite on Fedora 11 :
>>>>>
>>>>> on the test "stats" : # Assertion 'open_databases > 0 && max
>=
>>>>> open_databases, name' failed: should keep the same number of open
>>>>> databases
>>>>> when reaching the max_dbs_open limit
>>>>
>>>> I've had the same error for 0.9.0 when I ran couchdb as root
>>>> (different architecture though, it was OSX 10.4 PPC). I haven't
>>>> investigated why is it so, just noticed that test failed  w/root and
>>>> passed otherwise.
>>>
>>> I also see this failure running CouchDB on OS X 10.5.7 as a non-admin
>>> user.
>>>  I think we might want to dig into this a bit more and either fix it or
>>> disable the test before releasing 0.9.1.
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>
>> I haven't seen this failure in a while, but if it's the 0.9.1 release
>> candidate that's failing, I wouldn't be against disabling the test.
>>
>> Can we confirm that it's the 0.9.1 tarball that fails? Works for me here.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> --
>> Chris Anderson
>> http://jchrisa.net
>> http://couch.io
>



-- 
Chris Anderson
http://jchrisa.net
http://couch.io

Mime
View raw message