couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Damien Katz <dam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.1 release
Date Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:29:59 GMT
Unless this is a regression, I think we shouldn't hold up 0.9.1 for  
this. We can add the fix to the branch, and if we do a 0.9.2 it will  
be there.

-Damien

On Jun 29, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Paul Davis wrote:

> Like I said on the ticket, unless I'm mistaken, _restart only exists
> for testing purposes. This fix is more about fixing the test so that
> people aren't alarmed which to me doesn't change actual behavior as
> most people shouldn't be hitting _restart outside of test suites.
>
> As for the mechanics of doing a vote, I'd just wait for those that
> expressed concern about the test case failing to verify that a new
> 0.9.1 tarball doesn't fail and if so then move on with our lives.
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Noah Slater<nslater@apache.org>  
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:47:25PM -0400, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
>>> We don't necessarily need to hold up 0.9.1 while we discuss the  
>>> behavior
>>> of /_restart, but I think it's very likely that the implementation  
>>> of
>>> /_restart will change substantially in the near future.  I would  
>>> go so
>>> far as to recommend that people not use the /_restart feature in  
>>> 0.9.1
>>> and below.  Best,
>>
>> Jan, Chris, Damien, Chris, Paul, everyone else? Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
>>


Mime
View raw message