Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dundeemt@gmail.com designates
 209.85.217.162 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=gYb6zsDYiX053FL9clp7NOsyeOEuziRP5QI/rSHDlL2gCbFtv5VvAE/qIFYlx2r7dY
         UKnH7J9wWOmHJY8uP71TaLM3LCBM6A9yQ37Tr1ATnUrIEuqbH+d2FBnP3cQXW6zGkt15
         fXSJb6OBcsiSUDiw33W+OG6wCpn2p6pu1CgwE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: tech@dundeemt.com
In-Reply-To: <20090403024324.GF29334@tumbolia.org>
References: <20090402174056.4F8462388970@eris.apache.org>
	 <20090402174636.GS29334@tumbolia.org>
	 <C21974A6-E83D-43D1-8201-4A06D6F468AC@apache.org>
	 <20090403024324.GF29334@tumbolia.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 23:26:00 -0500
Message-ID: <5aaed53f0904022126s150e463o360f3506037813d5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SysV init problems,
 0.9.1 release? (was Re: svn commit: r761355 -
	in /couchdb/trunk: bin/couchdb.tpl.in configure.ac etc/init/couchdb.tpl.in
	var/Makefile.am)
From: "Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T" <dundeemt@gmail.com>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd4cd762771c404669ef2a1

--000e0cd4cd762771c404669ef2a1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:34:38AM +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> > +1 for the backport. And good find, I believe I stumbled over this
> > a few times and didn't think much of it and assumed an error on
> > my end.
>
> Essentially, it's a documentation bug. Kinda.
>
> I'm torn about doing a new release for it, really I am.
>
> Perhaps we should leave it a few weeks, see how we feel?
>
> --
> Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
>

This bit me a number of times already.  I figured it was do to frequent
builds I was doing or something else.  I would be +1 on putting it in a
0.9.1 but I would suggest holding off 2 weeks and incorporate any other
patches.  I suspect that .9.x. is going to be popular with people interested
but waiting for a packaged release if package maintainers know that there
will be a 0.9.1 coming in shortly, they'll wait and first impressions of
couchdb will be improved over a wider scope.

However, I don't have to do the work of building the release, Noah is the
one doing the work.

-Jeff Hinrichs

--000e0cd4cd762771c404669ef2a1--