Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80270 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2009 02:43:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2009 02:43:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 41856 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 02:43:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 41789 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2009 02:43:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 41779 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2009 02:43:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:43:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.68.94.123] (HELO tumbolia.org) (80.68.94.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:43:45 +0000 Received: from nslater by tumbolia.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LpZNM-000564-T7 for dev@couchdb.apache.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:43:24 +0100 Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 03:43:24 +0100 From: Noah Slater To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: SysV init problems, 0.9.1 release? (was Re: svn commit: r761355 - in /couchdb/trunk: bin/couchdb.tpl.in configure.ac etc/init/couchdb.tpl.in var/Makefile.am) Message-ID: <20090403024324.GF29334@tumbolia.org> Mail-Followup-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org References: <20090402174056.4F8462388970@eris.apache.org> <20090402174636.GS29334@tumbolia.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Noah: Awesome User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:34:38AM +0200, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > +1 for the backport. And good find, I believe I stumbled over this > a few times and didn't think much of it and assumed an error on > my end. Essentially, it's a documentation bug. Kinda. I'm torn about doing a new release for it, really I am. Perhaps we should leave it a few weeks, see how we feel? -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater