From dev-return-3836-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Wed Apr 08 08:50:10 2009
Return-Path: <dev-return-3836-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68851 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2009 08:50:10 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2009 08:50:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 81443 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 08:50:10 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81363 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2009 08:50:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.couchdb.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81353 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2009 08:50:09 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:50:09 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wout.mertens@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.240 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.132.240] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.240)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 08:50:01 +0000
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b2so3377ana.5
        for <dev@couchdb.apache.org>; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
         :subject:date:references:x-mailer;
        bh=WHHvXsYe7FfPOkZeGI6bro/0dkwIYejVR4cDMoSuTaY=;
        b=YqPNAkya2z4vPEDYIc85tDLNrybyaFWfCj3sU25ZOX9ij9sjEsyLe7pwsfmVAtAr76
         ATdZA5Ww/LTBuSin5cR/n4cWBXaFlqc6oGY1MO7l4UcGsZmt8jIql3RoWrZxk0vzGJv2
         4pDV6/jE4K69rAu76jxWaHSKd2Y2s39FwUJXY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references
         :x-mailer;
        b=hIU3HPuljNIznmUDuyiECSHYYIShuCDZwX66H2iF7j7Bx3zemLHL/lwep/ie9ppCNS
         vJ/eYzwntLe0z44JAA/ci8JAXndctkDt8dnMTuQkwBDqvuMlZO7cm2GS0NpUzKIdIZie
         FbwMLv12mgBJFtRp1IvDoiXYaUA6Xhx4IpUSM=
Received: by 10.100.140.15 with SMTP id n15mr2424196and.83.1239180580894;
        Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-peg3-cl31144-254-5-147.cisco.com (dhcp-peg3-cl31144-254-5-147.cisco.com [144.254.5.147])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm12225436yws.25.2009.04.08.01.49.38
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Message-Id: <D502E63A-1006-4337-8AE6-5656BFC72FF7@gmail.com>
From: Wout Mertens <wout.mertens@gmail.com>
To: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090408080746.GA7710@uk.tiscali.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Erlang vs Scala
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:49:37 +0200
References: <20090408080746.GA7710@uk.tiscali.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Apr 8, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Brian Candler wrote:

>> So I began to wonder if it wouldn't be better for CouchDB to be
>> written in Scala.
>
> Next you will be saying that it would be better for CouchDB to use XML
> instead of JSON :-)

Oh wow that'd be awesome! ;-)

Wout.