couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: db-options
Date Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:08:01 GMT
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Chris Anderson <jchris@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Robert Newson <robert.newson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Devs,
>>
>> Following a brief discussion on IRC, I wanted to hear general thoughts
>> and objections to introducing creation-time database options. That is,
>> allow couchdb databases to toggle some features on or off on a
>> per-database basis. Additionally, these options could be changed at
>> compaction time.
>>
>> The first concrete example of such an option would be a feature that
>> introduces single-instance storage of attachments. Namely, the
>> addition of another btree keyed on the sha1 evaluation of attachments.
>> The tree would be used to ensure only one copy of any particular
>> attachment exists in the database file. This option could be added or
>> removed during compaction also.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I think this is a great idea. I'd suggest keeping the db-options in
> the #db_header record. Which could get problematic if there get to be
> so many options that the header size starts to grow. Maybe there's a
> better answer, but this seems most straightforward.
>

There's also _local/ documents so that changes to config options don't
cause binary incompatibilities.

>
> --
> Chris Anderson
> http://jchrisa.net
> http://couch.io
>

Mime
View raw message