couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Backporting bug fixes to 0.9
Date Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:35:14 GMT
Now that is weird. Looks like this mail got stuck and
resent again after some timeout. Sorry about that.

Cheers
Jan
--

On 13 Apr 2009, at 12:25, Jan Lehnardt wrote:

> Hi,
>
> as I understand trunk is now effectively 0.10-dev. Do we want to
> maintain the 0.9.x branch and backport some of the bug fixes that
> go into trunk? (I'd say yes we do.)
>
> If yes, I'd like to propose the following commits to be backported:
>
> Fixes for leaked file handles, with test:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763858&view=rev
> (not sure if it is possible with the other changes near that commit)
>
> Fix for attachment sparseness bug COUCHDB-220 by giving each  
> attachment it's own stream and calling set_min_buffer instead of  
> ensure_buffer. Also fixed spurious couch_file crash messages by  
> putting the statistics decrement code into a seperate monitoring  
> process:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763816&view=rev
> (Again, not sure, if it is really possible)
>
> Use now_diff instead of statistics(runtime). Closes COUCHDB-316:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=762019&view=rev
> (Should be simple)
>
> And all updates to the README that are not 0.10 specific:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=761352&view=rev
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=761343&view=rev
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=760538&view=rev
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=760537&view=rev
>
> And I believe Noah had at least one fix for the build
> system, but I don't know which one. Noah?
>
>
> Any commits I missed?
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>


Mime
View raw message