couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Newson <robert.new...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: New configuration mechanism (Was: Re: svn commit: r767164 - in /couchdb/trunk: bin/couchdb.tpl.in etc/couchdb/Makefile.am etc/couchdb/default.d/ etc/couchdb/default.ini.tpl.in etc/couchdb/local.d/)
Date Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:20:10 GMT
I'm not yet a Debian anything (other than a user and a fan). :)

I intend to package couchdb-lucene for Debian 5.0 as soon as 0.3 is
done, which is a few weeks off.

Once I have a sensible package, I'll investigate getting into the main
Debian archive.

B.

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:49:36PM +0100, Robert Newson wrote:
>> That looks like exactly what I need when I package couchdb-lucene. I'd
>> include /etc/couchdb/default.d/couchdb-lucene.ini as a config file,
>> and that would hook couchdb-lucene up neatly. Remove the package and
>> it'll remove the config, nice and clean.
>
> Great.
>
>> I assume that later configuration settings override former ones?
>
> Yes.
>
>> I'd like to guarantee that couchdb-lucene's os_process_timeout is applied. I
>> suggest using numeric prefixes in the .ini files you supply in the core
>> couchdb package (assuming, actually, that /etc/couchdb/default.d/ would not be
>> empty by default), much like the rc.d and network hook scripts work
>> (01couchdb.ini, for example).
>
> The default.d and local.d directories will be empty by default.
>
> How the files are named is up to the local administrator or distribution.
>
> As your a Debian contributer, we can work together on the nascent collection of
> CouchDB related packages to make sure that any additional configuration files
> are named coherently and work together without conflicts.
>
> --
> Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
>

Mime
View raw message