couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wout Mertens <wout.mert...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Erlang vs Scala
Date Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:18:28 GMT
Hi Daniel,

Interesting, what hierarchy can you express in Sedna (XML) that you
can't express in CouchDB (JSON)?

Anyway the XML was with winking smiley, CouchDB had XML at first and
then switched :)

Wout.

On Thursday, April 9, 2009, Daniel Friesen <lists@danielfriesen.name> wrote:
> CouchDB as an XML database? Bah...
> If you're going xml why use Couch? XML already has XQuery standardized and there are
a number of XML database implementations already in existence.
> At work I'm using Sedna since we just couldn't handle our hierarchical structure inside
of CouchDB.
>
> ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
>
> Wout Mertens wrote:
>
> On Apr 8, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Brian Candler wrote:
>
>
> So I began to wonder if it wouldn't be better for CouchDB to be
> written in Scala.
>
>
> Next you will be saying that it would be better for CouchDB to use XML
> instead of JSON :-)
>
>
> Oh wow that'd be awesome! ;-)
>
> Wout.
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message