Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25501 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2009 17:18:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2009 17:18:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 43870 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2009 17:18:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 43513 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2009 17:18:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 43502 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2009 17:18:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:18:53 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jchris@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.31 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.31] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:18:44 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 2so19302ywt.5 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:18:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TTxgawnxim3KBQQx0lh/3xIgJFwzK73QNcDnJooEy+0=; b=KCqd81vx8/m3zr0AGz+7S2BDK0L49As6iQ+y16iod8bRKM9mm2T+8i+jTCQH5uevaY XMO65TAVaeJ3AwvLwJl/61uLtXhSE58cmwax7o+Xj9SeOTm+DqMBgSdgHvy/Oc1Rgtlk lkTT/3qyhntSVGkUjuBpGWELEgPTF9dJZzTrs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=vC1RASLSCNAq1xx7gNcluKz0gFtaKIn7OuDJ0CPoJncuSpXzHAXYw9A6NeIMdIcqxV g8uCslr79hZEZyFVWEa+PFeIS1ELDwR8DDoOIiEvn7N2jlLlS+e80dRPSAg6FzNK5iBc 28ugR8UAyC0bOPQkBtiP+4Znb0iFT3DwnQK24= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jchris@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.210.8 with SMTP id i8mr609307wfg.297.1236273502845; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:18:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <05E18836-952A-4231-AA0E-DBD562911815@gmx.de> References: <558BB659-56C4-432A-B6D8-D1DEB6DDADD4@gmail.com> <05E18836-952A-4231-AA0E-DBD562911815@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:18:22 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: a0b48b10adc1674b Message-ID: Subject: Re: I got a little carried away ... From: Chris Anderson To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Christopher Lenz wrote: > > If those are supposed to make it into 0.9.0, there's no way we can get the > release out by the end of this week (which is pretty much today or > tomorrow). Changes of this scale require review and testing, and ideally > documentation. Just saying :) > > Postpone by about 2 weeks, depending on when those changes land in trunk? > I'd say postpone. Adam's replication patches don't change the API, so they aren't an issue for client libraries, but both moving the _view endpoint to within the design doc path, and Damien's changes to the behavior of bulk_docs, will effect client libraries. If we can avoid making a release with APIs that are already deprecated, I think it's worth the wait. Alternatively, we could wait on Damien's branch (as it still requires some testing, and changes CouchDB in a more fundamental way, but one that has less impact on client libraries) but I'd be against doing a release without the design doc resources patch. We've never had a release with show/list, so doing one with a deprecated API places an unnecessary burden on client and application developers, who will probably have to support 0.9.0 for a while. Chris -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com