Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86739 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2009 20:26:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2009 20:26:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 61434 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2009 20:26:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 61401 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2009 20:26:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 61385 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2009 20:26:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:26:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.97.50.139] (HELO jan.prima.de) (83.97.50.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:26:47 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.6] (e178194190.adsl.alicedsl.de [::ffff:85.178.194.190]) (AUTH: LOGIN jan, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by jan.prima.de with esmtp; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:26:23 +0000 Message-Id: From: Jan Lehnardt To: dev@couchdb.apache.org In-Reply-To: <5b666c2e0903081223n67f629f8ve8b9b4878baf247a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: Introducing CouchDB Ltd. Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 21:25:52 +0100 References: <20090308141142.GG27778@tumbolia.org> <7060483c0903080836hc0c27o46dd510e5d17ee62@mail.gmail.com> <20090308153847.GA29574@tumbolia.org> <7060483c0903080904q6d0f7ee2ha48271264cfdd6cb@mail.gmail.com> <5b666c2e0903081223n67f629f8ve8b9b4878baf247a@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Dave, thanks for your feedback! On 8 Mar 2009, at 20:23, Dave butlerdi wrote: > Was quite suprised to see CouchDB Ltd on the slides from the Hadoop > meeting > in Berlin. Was unable to get up there but really think that this is > a bad > move. > You are an Apache project and this just seems counter productive. In which way exactly? Getting people paid to advance CouchDB? > I also > think that several other projects have become entailed of this type > of > behaviour and had problems with Apache in the end. We'd love to hear about past experiences so we can try and avoid the same mistakes. > I do not commit, not am I interested in commercialising my > experience with > the product, but use Couch. However, to use the project name for > commercail > gain by a few does seem wrong. Like Chris pointed out already, we'll be addressing this issue. Cheers Jan -- > Why not follow the Ruby/Rails example and set > up a community effort for the provision of services under the > CouchDB name. > > Just my .02. > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Matthieu Riou > wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Damien Katz >> wrote: >> >>> Standard disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. >>> >>> The name of the official project is Apache CouchDB. I see CouchDB as >> being >>> like Linux, where (as far as I know anyone) is free to use the >>> name. So, >> IMO >>> it is completely fair to name a company CouchDB Ltd. But it also >>> means >>> anyone else can name their company CouchDB LLC or The Real CouchDB >>> Ltd. >> This >>> is a bigger problem. You don't have a defensible trademark. >>> >> >> FWIW, the foundation has defended its project names as trademarks >> in the >> past, gently notifying companies that it'd be nicer if they didn't >> use that >> name (thinking of Tomcat and Wicket here for example). I don't know >> how >> that >> would stand in court but it's never been necessary to go to a court >> so far, >> so I guess the point is moot. >> >> Matthieu >> >> >> >>> >>> -Damien >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mar 8, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Chris Anderson wrote: >>> >>> Devs, >>>> >>>> I've felt the fair-competition argument a little on my own, so >>>> hearing >>>> it from other quarters gives it even greater weight. We're >>>> discussing >>>> ways to proceed that take into account the full community, >>>> including >>>> competitors (of which we hope to have many!) >>>> >>>> Thanks for the perspective, everyone. We'll have more to announce >>>> in >>>> the next few days. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Chris Anderson >>>> http://jchris.mfdz.com >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Regards > > Dave Butler > butlerdi-at-pharm2phork-dot-org > > Also on Skype as butlerdi > > Get Skype here http://www.skype.com/download.html > > > ********************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the system manager. > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by > MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > www.mimesweeper.com > **********************************************************************