Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88991 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2009 20:29:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2009 20:29:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 6436 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2009 20:29:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 6359 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2009 20:29:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 6349 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2009 20:29:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:29:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.46.255.197] (HELO vievsr21-int.chello.at) (213.46.255.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:28:55 +0000 Received: from edge05.upc.biz ([192.168.13.212]) by viefep14-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090323185730.GEVS28284.viefep14-int.chello.at@edge05.upc.biz> for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:57:30 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.12] ([77.251.205.123]) by edge05.upc.biz with edge id WixT1b02r2gGBKh05ixUCM; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:57:30 +0100 X-SourceIP: 77.251.205.123 Message-ID: <49C7DB97.7000009@ochtman.nl> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:57:27 +0100 From: Dirkjan Ochtman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: JavaScript 1.8 Features in SpiderMonkey (Please?) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 23/03/2009 19:34, Paul Davis wrote: > I don't think it'd be a good idea to require until it hits general > consumption (as in, shows up in package managers). Their build > procedure is at best, 'interesting'. Also, there's nothing to keep you > from linking couchjs against a newer version of the library. I haven't > groked all of the API breakage but there was a report on the list > awhile back that seemed to indicate that it only involved a minor > patch. Can you specify what's bad about their build procedure? I seem to recall that a lot of work on that was done in the past few months, and if not, I think I know who's in charge of it, so I could ask them about it. Cheers, Dirkjan