[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Noah Slater closed COUCHDB-169. ------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in r756665. Thank you. > POSIX shell incompatibilities > ------------------------------ > > Key: COUCHDB-169 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-169 > Project: CouchDB > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Infrastructure > Environment: Solaris > Reporter: Noah Slater > Assignee: Noah Slater > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 0.9 > > > > My local "checkbashisms" doesn't seem to complain at all. The [ ... ] syntax is just a shortcut for "test" and I would prefer to avoid it if possible. Could you check for me that using "test expr" wouldn't work in its place. > > No, "test expr" doesn't work. After test you can only have arguments to test, not shell expressions. It is possible of course to do: > > if test `echo 2> /dev/null >> $PID_FILE; echo $?` -gt 0; then > > For proof, see the man page: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5165/test-1?l=en&q=man&a=view > > > This seems reasonable, though checkbashisms doesn't report anything. > > > > I am wondering if your Solaris shell is POSIXly correct. Could you provide me with a pointer to its manual, please? > > It doesn't get more POSIX than Solaris :). > > $ /bin/sh > $ echo $(echo yes) > syntax error: `(' unexpected > > Here is the man page. Note that the "Command substitution" section doesn't mention anything about $() syntax. > > http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5165/sh-1?l=en&q=man&a=view > You may want to have a our collaborative notes over there: > > - http://wiki.joyent.com/accelerators:setup-couchdb > - http://discuss.joyent.com/viewtopic.php?id=24108 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.