On 5 Mar 2009, at 14:00, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2009, at 7:24 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>> I understand this and Adam's option 3 to be the same. What am I
>> missing? :)
>
> No, not quite. In Option 3 the two requesters get different
> responses. A gets the result of the original request, B gets the
> result of the replication triggered automatically after the first
> one that replicates any updates to the DB which happened during the
> first pass. If no updates occurred, B will receive the result of
> the first replication.
>
> Paul's Option 4 is more like Options 1 and 2, where A and B get
> identical responses. The difference between 1 and 2 is just whether
> new updates get included in that response.
Thanks for clearing that up. I prefer option 3.
Cheers
Jan
--
|