couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Damien Katz <dam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: rep_security merge to trunk
Date Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:31:07 GMT
I'm going to look into adding a "force conflicts" option today.

-Damien


On Mar 10, 2009, at 7:01 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:

>
> On 10 Mar 2009, at 23:44, Damien Katz wrote:
>
>> I think the rep_security branch is looking pretty solid. I still  
>> have work to do to merge with Adam's recent replicator changes.
>>
>> This patch breaks the file format and replication API, so  
>> replication with earlier versions is not possible. And the "all or  
>> nothing w/ conflict checking" transactions are gone. Which I think  
>> is good, because people were relying on it without understanding  
>> the rest of CouchDB doesn't support that feature.
>>
>> I'd like to go ahead and merge this to trunk. Comments, suggestions  
>> and objections please.
>
> I have an app that could benefit of the other variant of bulk  
> transactions that you offered in the initial proposal, namely having  
> all writes go through, regardless if they create conflicts or not.  
> Replication already offers this and a bulk request with the  
> `new_edits:false` flag set will give me that behaviour, but not for  
> documents that don't have a `_rev` member. CouchDB crashes when I  
> send it. I believe the patch to be not too hard (adding new `_rev`s  
> where they are missing) or I missing anything? I'm happy to come up  
> with a patch, if there are no objections. I also don't think this  
> would block merging the branch to trunk.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>


Mime
View raw message