couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Landolt <>
Subject Re: Introducing CouchDB Ltd.
Date Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:32:16 GMT
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Dave butlerdi <> wrote:

> Was quite suprised to see CouchDB Ltd on the slides from the Hadoop meeting
> in Berlin. Was unable to get up there but really think that this is a bad
> move.

I work for a company *very *unfriendly to (rather, more unfamiliar with)
open-source. Having commercial entities behind specific software projects
lends them a legitimacy to many people. If you're arguing that CouchDB Ltd.
may be an endorsement or misleading name, that's one thing, but I fail to
see the poor taste behind announcing any and all commercial endeavors behind

> You are an Apache project and this just seems counter productive. I also
> think that several other projects have become entailed  of this type of
> behaviour and had problems with Apache in the end.

Can you give an example? As an IP geek I'm always interested in reading
about how these kinds of things go wrong.

> I do not commit, not am I interested in commercialising my experience with
> the product,  but use Couch. However, to use the project name for
> commercail
> gain by a few does seem wrong. Why not follow the Ruby/Rails example and
> set
> up a community effort for the provision of services under the CouchDB name.

Can you expound on what you mean by that? I'm unfamiliar with the rails
community -- what does a "community effort for the provision of services"
look like?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message