couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zachary Zolton <zachary.zol...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Ideas for Changes to the Test Suite
Date Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:02:49 GMT
I second what JChris said. I wouldn't have been nervous about making
my first patch — even though involve some Erlang code — if there
wasn't that easy-to-grasp JavaScript test harness.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Chris Anderson <jchris@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Paul Davis
> <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2. I'd still argue that we shouldn't be using a browser as our native
>> test runner. We'd have to give up the little green check marks that
>> make us all feel warm and fuzzy when tests pass, but the browser is a
>> huge ass confounding variable.
>
> I know for sure that in-browser tests are a big part of what brought
> me to CouchDB. They tell the story of a web-native database in a way
> that nothing else can really touch. They also make it *incredibly
> easy* for newcomers to contribute.
>
>>To me, a proper test suite would be run
>> from directly from the command line. We have the hacked together test
>> runner, but not many people seem to use it regularly because we have
>> the fancy green check marks.
>>
>
> I think we're starting to feel the lack of Erlang unit tests. They
> sure would have helped me in my last few patches, and they'd make a
> decent beginning for documenting our native Erlang API.
>
> I think once we get the few Erlang tests that are already written,
> integrated into the build, and make it easy to add new ones, they will
> become the primary command-line test suite.
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Chris Anderson
> http://jchris.mfdz.com
>

Mime
View raw message