couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Anderson <jch...@apache.org>
Subject Re: couchdb transactions changes
Date Mon, 09 Feb 2009 05:51:32 GMT
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Adam Kocoloski <adam.kocoloski@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A bit more work is required, I think.  In addition to inserting MVCC commit
> point markers in the replication stream, we'd also have to include all the
> document/rev pairs that were part of the _bulk_docs update.  As it stands
> today, if one of those documents is updated again it will only show up at
> the later update_seq.
>
> This could actually get pretty hairy, now that I think of it.  What happens
> during compaction?  Do we save old revisions of a document if the revision
> was part of a _bulk_docs update?
>

Bulk transactions are starting to sound like they'd need to have a lot
of the same semantics as we've been treating documents as having.



-- 
Chris Anderson
http://jchris.mfdz.com

Mime
View raw message