couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RESULT]: Accept newline patch into CouchDB for 0.9 (Was: Re: VOTE: accept newline patch into CouchDB for 0.9)
Date Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:05:14 GMT

On 24 Feb 2009, at 12:44, Antony Blakey wrote:

>
> On 23/02/2009, at 3:17 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>> Collecting:
>>
>> On 23 Jan 2009, at 23:42, Noah Slater wrote:
>>> * Accept the patch (or a modified version) and add newline chars
>>
>> +1: 7 (2 binding)
>> -1: 3 (2 binding)
>>
>>> * Reject the patch (and any modified version) and do not add  
>>> newlines chars
>>
>> +1: 3 (2 binding)
>> -1: 4
>>
>>
>>> * Further discussion, to be decided before we release 0.9
>>
>> +1: 1 (1 binding)
>> -1: 1 (1 binding)
>>
>>> * Further discussion, to be decided after we release 0.9
>>
>> +1:
>> -1: 2 (2 binding)
>>
>> --
>>
>> It looks like we have a draw with weigh-in from the community
>> on a +1 to accept the patch.
>>
>> We need more discussion here.
>
> I'm a bit confused about this. Excuse me while I tread carefully. It  
> seems that the community vote is clearly a majority to accept the  
> patch. If the end result of this vote is that we don't follow that  
> vote because it's only the PMC vote that counts, doesn't that mean  
> that community votes are irrelevant?

No, you're absolutely right on the "Accept the patch" branch. But
there are enough community -1s to keep this open. A single
community -1 should be addressed in an ASF vote.


Cheers
Jan
--


Mime
View raw message