couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Damien Katz <>
Subject Re: proposed replication rev history changes
Date Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:40:40 GMT
I don't think it's strictly necessary, but it makes merging new edits  
simpler and it significantly reduces the chances of collisions between  
revision ids, there is less ambiguity. What downsides do your see?


On Feb 8, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:

> Hi Damien, it seems to me that you're conflating two separate  
> issues.  I agree that the revision history should be trimmed, and  
> that this will potentially introduce spurious conflicts when two  
> servers have no shared history for a document.  I don't see how this  
> change by itself requires the addition of a revseq to the JSON  
> revision format.  Is it really required?
> Adam

View raw message