couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Antivackis <patrick.antivac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Fail on a simple case on replication
Date Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:06:09 GMT
Oh and by the way, in a use case where there is only one database and you
don't use compaction because you want to keep everything, well _rev is a
revision that can be used to see the history of the document. I really don't
see the point of renaming an attribute to make it harder to understand it's
role. It's like all politically correct terminology where you use a stupid
expression in order to be as neutral as possible. IMO if you change this
attribute name it's even better to remove all possibilities to a access a
previous rev if still there, and change it's value by a timestamp

Regards

2009/2/24 Antony Blakey <antony.blakey@gmail.com>

>
> On 24/02/2009, at 12:51 PM, Antony Blakey wrote:
>
>  The project founder and the PMC, are all committed to that replication
>> model, which is derived from Notes.
>>
>
> BTW I'm the only one in the community that has expressed any strong desire
> to change this - I'm not implying any community division, just pointing out
> that it's both an historical artifact, and accepted by the major
> contributors and committers.
>
> Antony Blakey
> --------------------------
> CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
> Ph: 0438 840 787
>
> Plurality is not to be assumed without necessity
>  -- William of Ockham (ca. 1285-1349)
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message