couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: Transactional _bulk_docs
Date Thu, 05 Feb 2009 01:32:26 GMT
two questions...

1) where is this being forwarded from ?

2) Where was the decision made to remove the tx operation?

geir

On Feb 4, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Antony Blakey wrote:

> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> Gentlemen,
>>
>> I'm really hanging out on this issue. So far Damien has said that  
>> the transactional group-operation is definitely being removed,  
>> whilst Chris has said absolutely that no decision has been made.
>>
>> This has serious implications for me, because my code assumes a  
>> transactional _bulk_docs implementation.
>>
>> If it's being left as is, or simply being renamed, then I can move  
>> forward. If it's being removed, then I'm going to have to maintain  
>> a private fork, because I presume that a decision to remove it  
>> rather than rename it means that you wouldn't accept a patch that  
>> simply adds that code under a different name (otherwise, why remove  
>> it when you could just rename it?).
>>
>> Having to maintain a private fork has other serious implications  
>> for me.
>>
>> Is there some other way I need to approach this to get a resolution?
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> Antony Blakey
> -------------
> CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
> Ph: 0438 840 787
>
> Borrow money from pessimists - they don't expect it back.
>  -- Steven Wright
>
>


Mime
View raw message