couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Anderson <>
Subject Re: [Couchdb Wiki] Update of "CouchDB in the wild" by blackmagic rue
Date Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:59:11 GMT
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Randall Leeds <> wrote:
> Is there any way we can tell whether or not it uses CouchDB?
> Obviously, if not, we should remove it.
> Otherwise, I'd be tempted to say leave it.

I think Noah's point that it's a slippery slope is important. Perhaps
Gpirate is doing groundbreaking work with CouchDB... but if it were a
hate-site or porn it'd likely be obvious that we'd remove it. I'm not
sure where the line, as it is a fuzzy area.

Maybe the ASF has thought this issue over before. If there's prior
consensus from another ASF wiki about where the line is, it could make
our decision easier.

> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:59, Noah Slater <> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:11:22PM -0500, Patrick Aljord wrote:
>> > gpirate is a search engine  and as such, has no clue what's described by
>> a
>> > .torrent file beyond what the basic information sections of the .torrent
>> > file tell them. At no time does any copyrighted content actually reside
>> on
>> > gpirate's servers, nor does it pass through gpirate's network. If you
>> > consider a .torrent file a "map," that map tells you the names of places
>> > (which may or may not be accurate), and how to get there.
>> I am not for one second accusing gpirate of breaking the law.
>> However, I am raising a concern with the framing of the website. For a
>> start,
>> the website is called GPirate which is a reference to copyright
>> infringement.
>> The website homepage has links to movies and TV shows I might like, the
>> ones
>> listed for me being items that would involve copyright infringement if I
>> was to
>> download them. There is an obvious framing here that the site is to be used
>> for
>> infringing copyright.
>> I think that is a major problem, and I'm not sure we should link to it.
>> > Also, note that all these torrents are available on google too.
>> My concerns do not apply to Google because they frame their website and
>> purpose
>> differently. When you visit Google you're not prompted or reminded about
>> opportunities for copyright infringement.
>> --
>> Noah Slater,

Chris Anderson

View raw message