couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antony Blakey <>
Subject Re: [Couchdb Wiki] Update of "CouchDB in the wild" by blackmagic rue
Date Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:46:31 GMT

On 23/01/2009, at 9:40 AM, lenz wrote:

> the situation here is different, it is a product page and it is  
> actively
> edited by the community. after all it is a public wiki. if someone  
> thinks
> that it is not right, change it, cut out the link part and just  
> leave the
> wording, make a note, delete it and wait for the response of those  
> entering
> the links. it is public opinion.

I think that promotes a battleground mentality. I'll delete any links  
that reference or contain religious/violent/neocon/gambling/ 
hypocritical-anti-drug/pro-life etc material, even if the linked site  
isn't *about* that, but merely happens to contain such material.  
Someone puts it back, I take it down. That's the consequence of your  

Before long you have to ban some people from editing, and that is the  
equivalent of making a moral judgement. The system I proposed  
acknowledges that judgement is required, but shifts the domain from  
morals to a technical requirement on the format, and completeness of  
the annotation of the entry. And whilst I admit that my proposal is  
strongly grounded in a philosophical position, IMO it is also the most  
practical because the judgement is as far as possible objective and  

> i think that a product promotion page (thats what it is in fact) has  
> a very
> different purpose than a broadly available news site or the way ISPs  
> deal
> with content on their systems. i think if in doubt, delete the link  
> and wait
> for the reaction or change the link into a text only link to not push
> traffic to pages that might not reflect the views of the majority of  
> the
> community.

"the views of the majority of the community" sounds a lot like mob  

Antony Blakey
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787

One should respect public opinion insofar as is necessary to avoid  
starvation and keep out of prison, but anything that goes beyond this  
is voluntary submission to an unnecessary tyranny.
   -- Bertrand Russell

View raw message