couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul Davis" <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Releasing 0.9
Date Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:33:49 GMT
+1

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:18:44PM -0800, Chris Anderson wrote:
>> I tend to agree with you. `make check` should be running some other unit
>> tests. For instance, if we had a test suite for the view server, that could go
>> here, as well as Jan's config tests, and hopefully a whole suite of unit tests
>> eventually.
>
> Yes, lets remember some of the contexts that "make check" is run, such as
> automatic packaging scripts, GNU/Linux nightly build hosts, &c.
>
> Simple is better, we can't be spawning random network services.
>
>> The thing about this test client is that it should take a couchdb host
>> URL as an argument anyway. This makes it more broadly useful, for
>> instance via shell scripts to check the health of a cluster.
>
> How about this as a sample work-flow:
>
>  $ make check
>
>  Starting CouchDB unit tests...
>
>  ...
>
>  CouchDB does not run its functional tests from the `check` target.
>
>  To run the functional tests, run this command from the root source directory:
>
>    ./utils/test URI
>
>  Using the URI of your running CouchDB server.
>
>  $ ./utils/test URI
>
>  Starting CouchDB functional tests...
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Noah Slater, http://bytesexual.org/nslater
>

Mime
View raw message