From couchdb-dev-return-125-apmail-incubator-couchdb-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Sat Mar 15 02:48:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-couchdb-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 38700 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2008 02:48:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2008 02:48:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 10012 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2008 02:48:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-couchdb-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9984 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2008 02:48:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact couchdb-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: couchdb-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list couchdb-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9975 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2008 02:48:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:48:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sa3ruby@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.177] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:47:51 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n4so5720445wag.6 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:48:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=gU1DRtFf30N4FW7cK2fjUmbYR4KB3HepsWEQ7EL94eY=; b=cK4hxDDHHjE2MVtZX/7fhaUS0IvAkxVzaSPawXLKZUtjRs9WJ8HMPCcfQ+7+ZoOSxxslh4xcuX+3plo2Rp7qKm9Fu2npZWhw28nCOHt104+myWCyYutWI+Ph0GLJ1qpsiK1vXmtGBfvSFI0+L4bnjBbxJmQlapfKtTJEdPvQDDU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=uhc0TcopFxq8B6rg1MqEiT99Ku4IdVny3IHz9HJHcYsPD1YPTy5MZu7iyAO/GUtDCFcbFvaxar8qsA1QNpcXdqSW4jlMDaNExit+DiCLfgaR9NvtY6q8I2aUrgZaUiB11dYwiv/hpdmqe7WrYKb1wLnZ/wPmdsSsCMNAtpufn6A= Received: by 10.114.184.7 with SMTP id h7mr13181648waf.28.1205549291083; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:48:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.241.19 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:48:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3d4032300803141948y751a82ebt5f4a3130dd221379@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:48:11 -0400 From: "Sam Ruby" Sender: sa3ruby@gmail.com To: couchdb-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (INFRA-1540) CouchDB Podling would like a MoinMoin wiki setting up In-Reply-To: <20080315010657.GE6203@bytesexual.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1607680641.1204135911458.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <2005420143.1205514504582.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <20080314184124.GB6203@bytesexual.org> <3d4032300803141144q597af7dds18cd014222c0f72e@mail.gmail.com> <20080315010657.GE6203@bytesexual.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7dc8e3d45534e7e1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:44:56PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > > Which do we want? I would vote for commits. > > > > Why? :-) > > I guess it comes down to email management. > > I see a division between mailing list discussions or JIRA commenting and the > automatically generated notifications from Subversion or MoinMoin. The hope is that eventually CouchDB will become a PMC. The PMC will be responsible for for the project. As long as this dividing line doesn't result in Subversion or MoinMoin changes going unmonitored, there isn't a problem. > For that reason alone, it makes sense to split these into separate lists. > > Admittedly, the disparity between the name "commits" and the process of updating > a wiki irks me a little, but that might mean that the list could have a better > name, could do with being two lists for MoinMoin and Subersion or me being wrong. > > I don't feel strongly either way. > > > P.S. Don't treat this as a challenge. There isn't a wrong answer. > > You're going to have to do a lot better than that to put me on the defensive. ;) :-) - Sam Ruby