Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-corinthia-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-corinthia-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1E2C18F5E for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:35:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23746 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2015 17:35:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-corinthia-dev-archive@corinthia.apache.org Received: (qmail 23714 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2015 17:35:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@corinthia.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23703 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2015 17:35:38 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:35:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5311DC1306 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:35:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.975 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.975 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z_2-D_f-pCY8 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with SMTP id 510222302F for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23559 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2015 17:35:26 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:35:26 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.36] (unknown [202.44.228.17]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id CD9151A0325 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:35:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Peter Kelly Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FEEBAFC8-9994-4C9D-913C-59C522C951BF" Message-Id: <59808968-F6D1-4CB0-A3EC-D423B0E9B962@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [PRE-VOTE] Release candidate 0.1 Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 00:35:19 +0700 References: <004f01d0d6b1$462f3a00$d28dae00$@acm.org> To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) --Apple-Mail=_FEEBAFC8-9994-4C9D-913C-59C522C951BF Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On 15 Aug 2015, at 12:23 am, jan i wrote: >=20 > We could name the release candidates .rcx some projects to do that. = But I > personally do not like that we vote about foo.r5.zip but upload = foo.zip to > the release > server. I want to vote on the exact image that will be uploaded to = dist. Actually I think having .rcx would be good, because then we can easily = distinguish between the different versions, and when the official [VOTE] = begins it can be =E2=80=9CVote if you agree that foo-0.1.rc5.zip (with = signature 0xABCDEF) should become the official 0.1 release=E2=80=9D. = Then there=E2=80=99s no ambiguity as to which actual file we=E2=80=99re = voting on. =E2=80=94 Dr Peter M. Kelly pmkelly@apache.org PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key = (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966) --Apple-Mail=_FEEBAFC8-9994-4C9D-913C-59C522C951BF--