corinthia-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jan i <>
Subject Problems with "Optional" in the ODF and OOXML standard.
Date Sat, 08 Aug 2015 17:39:08 GMT

Aytha, please meet the corinthia team (did you remember to subscribe to the

Team, please meet Aytha who is doing a academic research to provide us with
on differences in implementations.

We want tables to cover 2 situations:
- Application defined features (in this case how an implementation handles
the feature)
- Optional features (in this case does the implementation handle the

"application defined" is clearly marked in the standards, but it seems
"optional" are not,
can anybody give Aytha a hand by telling how to identify optional ?

Please remember "reply all" as I am not sure Aytha is subscribed.

thanks in advance.
jan i.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message