Mailing-List: contact dev-help@corinthia.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <161F112E-F50A-4C2B-B69B-C320F60B0FAB@apache.org>
References: 
 <CAKw-CVJtZ9_OZq3iEd8pv5qZAsgu+-ik-OVw24W0JswfP2eYpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK2iWdTRgA0ECzeYEcE8JAHXkKoO+hcet8rCSt4eig2Y+0z2-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALfVaATAuym2kZ-OsHc4XgXJ8sx2Gk62DXPtjG1LoPJEDPtjDQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK2iWdQ7SnKYNfd3O7hHZqR4thmu67kneSgD-QSyprzm+cOrZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<D6EF2696-9CAC-401E-A6C7-AAD250E9E4DF@apache.org>
	<CAK2iWdTfMSW0+-GZwH09vOHzXMqvkaAvynTscJKx4xv5vyZ_Gg@mail.gmail.com>
	<COL127-W32BC32DDA568C174DF398B5A10@phx.gbl>
	<161F112E-F50A-4C2B-B69B-C320F60B0FAB@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:54:39 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAK2iWdRkduuZeDT3DFx_if+UP=DOy5r56A=Xpg1++xs1YPpowg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Header level > 6
From: jan i <jani@apache.org>
To: "dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org" <dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0141a006e710be051920a426

--089e0141a006e710be051920a426
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 22 June 2015 at 20:20, Peter Kelly <pmkelly@apache.org> wrote:

> > On 23 Jun 2015, at 1:10 am, Franz de Copenhague <franz@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > <p class=3D"Strong" id=3D"word253" style=3D"corinthia-outline-level:2">
> >       <span id=3D"word259">This is a paragraph Strong with outline leve=
l
> 2</span>
> >  </p>
> >
> > Or
> >
> > <p class=3D"Strong" id=3D"word253" data-corinthia-outline-level=3D2">
> >       <span id=3D"word259">This is a paragraph Strong with outline leve=
l
> 2</span>
> >  </p>
>
> Of these two, I think that the CSS property would be the better choice.
> The main reason is that we could use it in both style definitions *and*
> inline style attributes; that is, it would be consistent. As Jan mentione=
d,
> this would allow us to maintain information about heading levels greater
> than 6, while still having fully valid HTML and CSS.
>
> It=E2=80=99s my understanding that it=E2=80=99s pretty widely accepted pr=
actice to add
> vendor prefixes to CSS properties, so this shouldn=E2=80=99t pose a probl=
em. I
> think it=E2=80=99s usually done with a leading - though, so we could have
> -corinthia-outline-level=3DN
>
+1 to your naming scheme, there was some talks about 2 years ago, about
standardizing the names (giving you a possibility to register the vendor
name).

rgds
jan i

>
> =E2=80=94
> Dr Peter M. Kelly
> pmkelly@apache.org
>
> PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key=
>
> (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)
>
>

--089e0141a006e710be051920a426--