corinthia-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Franz de Copenhague <franzdecopenha...@outlook.com>
Subject RE: libxml2 and iconv question, do we really need iconv ?
Date Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:13:18 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jan i [mailto:jani@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 4:29 AM
> To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: libxml2 and iconv question, do we really need iconv ?
> 
> Hi.
> 
> I am nearly finished with the x64 port for windows, I have compiled all
> libraries we need.
> 
> I wanted to see if we could keep the library sources in our Repo, and
> integrate them in our build system, as it would simplify things. Since I am
> biased I asked on general@i.a.o to get the opinion of outside Mentors. I got a
> few responses (strangely enough all in private), and it turns out many
> projects do as I suggest.
> 
> However one of the others mentors found a license problem with iconv. We
> do not use iconv, but by default libxml2 does. I can configure libxml2 not to
> include iconv, but I wanted to ask in here, if we need the functionality ?
> 
> If not my plan has changed a bit, and I will include the sources in platform,
> make a single commit with each original source, noting the URL and version in
> the commit text (and add it to LICENSE). Then I will add my changes, which
> will be solely CMAKE files NO source changes.
> 
> Having the source in our build system, will also allow us to decide how to
> handle other platforms.
> 
> Rgds
> jan I.

dfwebserver  will need iconv or similar functionality to reduce the image resources resolution
in documents to improve download performance in the client editor.

franz

Mime
View raw message