corinthia-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Franz de Copenhague <FranzDeCopenha...@outlook.com>
Subject RE: ReviewBoard
Date Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:47:50 GMT
Jira is good for task and bug managment.

ReviewBoard is just code review tool.

Both are complement.

Send from my $60 smartphone
________________________________
De: jan i<mailto:jani@apache.org>
Enviado: ‎3/‎23/‎2015 10:32 AM
Para: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org<mailto:dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org>
Asunto: Re: ReviewBoard

On 23 March 2015 at 13:09, Franz de Copenhague <
franzdecopenhague@outlook.com> wrote:

> ReviewBoard is a very productive tool to review code and I have realized
> that apache has this tool. https://reviews.apache.org/groups
>
>
>
> So far, I have learnt that each project has its corresponding group in
> review board. I would like to use this tool to submit patches and code
> change, and other developers can review them and discuss the changes and
> provide feedbacks at coding level.
>
>
>
> I don't know who administrate reviewboard to request a new group for
> Corinthia project.
>

I have an idea, let me check it.

But I do think that Jira is a better tool, because we then have the history.

I have no strong bias on reviewboard or jira, but I think we should only
use one of them.

What do others think?

rgds
jan I.


>
>
> Juande
>
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message