Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-corinthia-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-corinthia-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DE1C101D6 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58920 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2015 20:04:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-corinthia-dev-archive@corinthia.apache.org Received: (qmail 58892 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2015 20:04:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@corinthia.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58881 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2015 20:04:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:04:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of dennis.hamilton@acm.org does not designate 216.234.124.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.234.124.50] (HELO barracuda.supercp.com) (216.234.124.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:04:02 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1423685024-08c1cb0fa12fdbd30001-KCmPzH Received: from a2s42.a2hosting.com (a2s42.a2hosting.com [216.119.133.2]) by barracuda.supercp.com with ESMTP id RUumRDtlYoTMAjOA for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:03:44 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: dennis.hamilton@acm.org X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 216.119.133.2 Received: from 75-165-123-152.tukw.qwest.net ([75.165.123.152]:32977 helo=Astraendo2) by a2s42.a2hosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YLdVf-003hw2-Ai for dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:03:43 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" To: Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] ODF Support in Corinthia Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:03:41 -0800 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [DISCUSS] ODF Support in Corinthia Organization: NuovoDoc Message-ID: <00b701d04635$d647dff0$82d79fd0$@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AdBGNbCbUuyhMPH4TSC9G2RZyOmy7g== Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2s42.a2hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - corinthia.incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - acm.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: a2s42.a2hosting.com: authenticated_id: himself+orcmid.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed X-Barracuda-Connect: a2s42.a2hosting.com[216.119.133.2] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1423685024 X-Barracuda-URL: https://216.234.124.50:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi Received-SPF: softfail (supercp.com: domain of transitioning dennis.hamilton@acm.org does not designate 75.165.123.152 as permitted sender) X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at supercp.com X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=4.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests=BSF_SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.15152 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 BSF_SPF_SOFTFAIL Custom Rule SPF Softfail X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ah well, it wasn't private so much as I didn't want to clutter the list = with fine points. -----Original Message----- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamilton@acm.org]=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 11:21 To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org Subject: [OFF-LIST] RE: [DISCUSS] ODF Support in Corinthia I don't understand "Developers can cam from good plans." I don't think of descriptions and sketches as plans, in the case of = software. Perhaps because I see planning and scheduling confused = together so much. But I think planning at least specifies a progression = and staging of work and I am wary of anything like that absent someone = who is prepared to follow-through. This is probably a trifle though. PS: It helps me if you do not copy me directly when posting to the list. = It makes it hard for me to know which is the one from the list so that = I can reply without breaking the thread in the mail archive. -----Original Message----- From: Louis Su=C3=A1rez-Potts [mailto:luispo@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 09:54 To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org; Dennis E. Hamilton Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ODF Support in Corinthia > On 11-02-2015, at 12:45, Dennis E. Hamilton = wrote: >=20 > -- replying below to -- > From: Louis Su=C3=A1rez-Potts [mailto:luispo@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 06:04 > To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org; Dennis E. Hamilton > Subject: Re: UnRTF Makes HTML > [ ... ] >=20 > Perhaps we need to return, however, to our roadmap ambition. For = instance, what kind of plans do we have regarding ODF support? If we = think it is time to return to roadmap discussions, let=E2=80=99s start a = new thread on that subject and focus, yes? >=20 > A start? >=20 > I'm not so sure about plans, since it depends on where the developer = effort comes from, but I can see some definition happening. Developers can cam from good plans.=20 [ ... ]=20