Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-corinthia-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-corinthia-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE33F1771C for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 12:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84821 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2015 12:55:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-corinthia-dev-archive@corinthia.apache.org Received: (qmail 84796 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2015 12:55:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@corinthia.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84785 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2015 12:55:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 12:55:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1993.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_SBL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.3] (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 12:54:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 84440 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2015 12:54:39 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 12:54:39 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.37] (unknown [202.44.228.17]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id DB4E31A003F for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 12:54:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Peter Kelly Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_631C06B3-00D7-4B61-A7B6-32483101D29D" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2064\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r1649986 - /incubator/corinthia/www/index.html Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 19:54:23 +0700 References: <20150107022034.EEB6DAC003E@hades.apache.org> <54AD001B.6030703@apache.org> To: dev@corinthia.incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <54AD001B.6030703@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2064) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail=_631C06B3-00D7-4B61-A7B6-32483101D29D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I think that given the early state of the project website we should be = focusing on the content and set of pages we present, not fiddling with = layout. This is simply bikeshedding, which I=E2=80=99m seeing a lot more = than I=E2=80=99d hoped for so far in the mailing lists. How about we concentrate on important things like: - Writing an ODF filter - Instructions on how to build and work with the existing codebase = (including coding style, workflow, and architecture discussion) - A detailed set of goals we hope to achieve with the project (the = proposal is a start, but nowhere near what we ultimately need) - Based on the detailed set of goals, figure out what functionality we = want to expose from the API My vote is to to have Dorte take responsibility of the design aspects = (it=E2=80=99s certainly not my area of expertise), and for us to = concentrate on the content and mission of the project. Arguments over = font sizes and line endings seem like the least important aspects of the = project I could imagine. =E2=80=94 Dr Peter M. Kelly pmkelly@apache.org PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key = (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966) > On 7 Jan 2015, at 7:15 pm, Andrea Pescetti = wrote: >=20 > On 07/01/2015 jan i wrote: >> Having now studied your patch, I have 3 questions: >=20 > I suggest to set Reply-To for the commits list to dev and assume that = people who subscribe to commits read dev and that all mails to commits = are automatically originated. >=20 >> - Is it on purpose you changed all lines in the file....that is kind = of >> very brutal. >=20 > This is just due to broken line ending detection. = http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/corinthia/www/index.html?r1=3D16498= 90&r2=3D1649986&pathrev=3D1649986&diff_format=3Dh shows it correctly, = it's one line. >=20 >> - Why only change one file, this effect is on all pages. >=20 > This is correct, but maybe the problem is with repeating the same = footer across all pages by copy-paste. Anyway yes, it's surely better to = enforce consistency of the footer if we have no technology to include it = automatically (but at the very least I expect that SSI is enabled). >=20 >> - What is the urgency, that needed a "brute force fix" instead of = doing it >> correct >=20 > Actually this is kind of the right way to do it. I mean: > - Changing the Foundation files is a no-go. You want to be able to = update to a newer version of the framework. So what Dennis thought to be = the "right way" is not the right way at all: Foundation files are to be = considered read-only. > - Overriding default settings with a custom CSS file loaded after the = default ones is what you should do and what I recommend as a good = practice, even though I never played with Foundation. > - Missing that, inline styles are an acceptable trade-off. >=20 >> It breaks the responsive design. >=20 > No it doesn't, since it does not make changes that are relevant for = the box model. This is true of this particular case only, of course. >=20 > By the way, I started fixing it yesterday but then saw Dorte's mail = and stopped. Anyway, if you modify line 83 at the link above from >
> to >
> you solve the margin problem Dennis was unhappy with. But I didn't = have time to check whether this is semantically the best solution. >=20 > Regards, > Andrea. --Apple-Mail=_631C06B3-00D7-4B61-A7B6-32483101D29D--