cordova-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Grieve (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Resolved] (CB-341) allow Cordova's module runtime to be replaced with a different runtime
Date Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:15:19 GMT


Andrew Grieve resolved CB-341.

    Resolution: Won't Fix

I don't see the benefit of this.

> allow Cordova's module runtime to be replaced with a different runtime
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CB-341
>                 URL:
>             Project: Apache Cordova
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: CordovaJS
>            Reporter: Patrick Mueller
>            Assignee: Filip Maj
>            Priority: Minor
> I don't think there's a given use case for this right now, but we might see one in a
future Cordova that ships it's plugins as CJS modules, externally.  Today the "batteries provided"
plugins use the module runtime in a protected way, which is fine as we ship a single "cordova-x.y.z.js"
as our release (we do not ship CJS modules externally).
> Once we do ship CJS modules externally, folks might want to do a "build" which uses some
other "compliant" runtime.  Eg, almond, requirejs, or Dojo.  See some discussion here: 
> Some folks working on Dojo have expressed some interest in seeing something like this
work, so I figured I'd go ahead and plant a stake in the ground, for the work that will need
to happen at Cordova, and for other module runtime devs to follow along with.
> At this point, the only work I see us doing is nailing down what are runtime requirements
for our module system are.  They are basically CJS modules, with the simple AMD define(moduleId,
factoryFunction) API added - no plugins or any of that jazz from "the AMD spec".  But we should
be more specific.  By having some kind of test harness that would easily allow someone to
test their AMD runtime being used by Cordova's modules.  
> Seems like most AMD impls should work out of the box with this, but it turns out they
don't; see the above email thread for more info.  
> We could actually build a test harness for this today, as a new task in the Jakefile.
 I'd be happy to do this if someone is willing to fix their module impl enough to try.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message