Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKP6k2vc5jXLZCaeLCAXGLye4nNG5BpB28Wqg=wDhYZ8BEwqpA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE6O_-YB9mrpNJ1WN9a9Q3z34rn8tLFG36SLhSBOEKkC6jAvOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-Y=iTBaRyGWmkfekF4piWN_brx9ZVvetdOMk7ZyiVXUFw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKP6k2vc5jXLZCaeLCAXGLye4nNG5BpB28Wqg=wDhYZ8BEwqpA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:36:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOBL_k4NdTK=42CV41kfA5wfcNXOMzj2=2z-4W38CuYYbeSLKg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Not requiring an iCLA for contributions
To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11441caa7b1667053c670ec5
archived-at: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:36:52 -0000

--001a11441caa7b1667053c670ec5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I'll agree to this, since I don't know what the definition of trivial is
w.r.t. Apache.

+1

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Bump. There can't be lazy consensus on this. Before I potentially waste
> > time on drafting a proposal, trying to feel the temperature on this
> change.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > It's up to us to decide, and right now we require the iCLA except for
> > > trivial contributions.
> > >
> > > I want to change this to a more relaxed requirement:
> > > 1. Non-committers do not require an iCLA (you need one anyway to get an
> > > account, so that's really a non-issue)
> > > 2. Require a clear intent by the author to contribute under our normal
> > > terms, for a non-trivial change
> > >
> > > So some of you will be wondering, what does Apache say about this?
> > > From: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-infrastru
> > > cture-dev/201112.mbox/%3CA603FFCE-623B-43E9-87F8-39BAA51C72D1@gbiv.com
> > %3E
> > >
> > > Roy Fielding:
> > > "Yes, that opinion comes from me speaking as a board member and
> > > author of the Apache License, and has previously been cleared
> > > with Apache's legal team for a long ago discussion with Incubator.
> > > We don't need a CLA on file to accept contributions from
> non-committers.
> > > We just need a clear intent by the author to contribute under
> > > our normal terms."
> > >
> > > Other opinions: http://apetro.ghost.io/apache-contributors-no-cla/
> > >
> > > We need to change our Contribute page:
> > > http://cordova.apache.org/contribute/
> > >
> > > ... as well as any PR templates:
> > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-media/blob/master/.
> > > github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
> > >
> > > This declaration of intent, if posted on Github, will be reflected on
> > > dev@cordova.apache.org since Apache sends out an email on each PR or
> > > comment to a PR, so we will be able to track it in our archives.
> > >
> > > As usual it is always the committer's responsibility to make sure that
> > all
> > > code they push to a repository is compliant with ASF policies.
> > >
> > >
> >
>

--001a11441caa7b1667053c670ec5--