cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Not requiring an iCLA for contributions
Date Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:46:55 GMT
So, it's basically the same system that we have now.  I still think we
should get clear intent from the author, since that's more useful and easy
than determining whether it's trivial.  I mean, isn't sending a PR through
GitHub already clear intent?

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:

> You decide per pr if you think it is trivial.
>
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'll agree to this, since I don't know what the definition of trivial is
> > w.r.t. Apache.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > @purplecabbage
> > > risingj.com
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bump. There can't be lazy consensus on this. Before I potentially
> waste
> > > > time on drafting a proposal, trying to feel the temperature on this
> > > change.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's up to us to decide, and right now we require the iCLA except
> for
> > > > > trivial contributions.
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to change this to a more relaxed requirement:
> > > > > 1. Non-committers do not require an iCLA (you need one anyway to
> get
> > an
> > > > > account, so that's really a non-issue)
> > > > > 2. Require a clear intent by the author to contribute under our
> > normal
> > > > > terms, for a non-trivial change
> > > > >
> > > > > So some of you will be wondering, what does Apache say about this?
> > > > > From: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-infrastru
> > > > > cture-dev/201112.mbox/%3CA603FFCE-623B-43E9-87F8-
> > 39BAA51C72D1@gbiv.com
> > > > %3E
> > > > >
> > > > > Roy Fielding:
> > > > > "Yes, that opinion comes from me speaking as a board member and
> > > > > author of the Apache License, and has previously been cleared
> > > > > with Apache's legal team for a long ago discussion with Incubator.
> > > > > We don't need a CLA on file to accept contributions from
> > > non-committers.
> > > > > We just need a clear intent by the author to contribute under
> > > > > our normal terms."
> > > > >
> > > > > Other opinions: http://apetro.ghost.io/apache-contributors-no-cla/
> > > > >
> > > > > We need to change our Contribute page:
> > > > > http://cordova.apache.org/contribute/
> > > > >
> > > > > ... as well as any PR templates:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-media/blob/master/.
> > > > > github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
> > > > >
> > > > > This declaration of intent, if posted on Github, will be reflected
> on
> > > > > dev@cordova.apache.org since Apache sends out an email on each PR
> or
> > > > > comment to a PR, so we will be able to track it in our archives.
> > > > >
> > > > > As usual it is always the committer's responsibility to make sure
> > that
> > > > all
> > > > > code they push to a repository is compliant with ASF policies.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message