cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon MacDonald <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Discuss] Cordova-Android 6.0.x
Date Tue, 13 Sep 2016 18:12:17 GMT
I'd love to help out testing but I'm traveling all week. Happy to assist
you next week with more testing if you can't find enough other folks to
help out this week.


Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK, so it looks like all our ducks are lined up and we should be ready for
> a 6.0 release pretty soon.  How do people feel about doing testing this
> week, and getting the vote thread going on Monday? I know the vote thread
> is only 72 hours, so I want a bit more testing on the major before we do it
> because the PRs haven't been getting the attention that I wanted them to.
>
> What do people think?
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ask Crosswalk to:
> > "To detach the fork and turn it into a standalone repository on GitHub,
> > contact GitHub Support."
> >
> > From:
> > https://help.github.com/articles/why-are-my-
> contributions-not-showing-up-
> > on-my-profile/
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey
> > >
> > > So, this is exciting.  Things are broken on Master if you're trying to
> > use
> > > Cordova with Jellybean.  Apparently we forgot to add a failsafe for the
> > > bridge to go back to APIs lower than 19, so the bridge doesn't work if
> > > you're targeting people still on Jellybean.  Unfortunately, we still
> have
> > > to support Jellybean despite the fact that their jsToNativeBridge is
> > > prompt.
> > >
> > > Also, I just realized that I can't send a PR to Crosswalk, since I own
> > the
> > > initial crosswalk repo on GitHub. (Oops!)  This means that I need
> someone
> > > from the Crosswalk project to adopt these changes here to get this to
> > work
> > > on Cordova-Android 6.0.0
> > >
> > > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine/tree/
> > Crosswalk_Compat
> > >
> > > I'm tempted to nuke the thing in the near future, since the Crosswalk
> > > Project should be managing the repository and their repository should
> be
> > > the canonical source for everything Crosswalk/Cordova related and not
> my
> > > prototype repo. :P
> > >
> > > So, is anyone using the stock webview for Jellybean, and should we
> spend
> > > time fixing this issue? We changed the webview because we found that
> > using
> > > multiple webviews in an application was falling apart, and we needed
> this
> > > change for stability so we knew which callbacks go to which instance of
> > > webview.  However, if people reviewed the patch requests, they would
> have
> > > noticed that this doesn't work on API 16. :(
> > >
> > > I'm going to go by the assumption that we want this fixed until I hear
> > > otherwise for now.  That said, if people think it's reasonable to
> > recommend
> > > that people targeting Jellybean use Crosswalk, I'm cool with that as
> > well.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:25 AM, julio cesar sanchez <
> > > jcesarmobile@gmail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Those 2 lines have minSdkVersion 14
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/blob/master/
> > > > framework/AndroidManifest.xml#L22
> > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/blob/master/
> > > > test/AndroidManifest.xml#L48
> > > >
> > > > Maybe I looked into the wrong place and that is not being used
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El martes, 6 de septiembre de 2016, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com
> > > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bowserj@gmail.com');>> escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:14 AM, julio cesar sanchez <
> > > > > jcesarmobile@gmail.com
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Now we shouldn't forget to increase the minSdkVersion. I couldn't
> > > find
> > > > an
> > > > > > issue open for this. Which API level did we say that we will
> > support?
> > > > 16?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > Yes, we said 16.  I already did it when bumping up to API 24, but
> an
> > > > issue
> > > > > would be nice.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El martes, 6 de septiembre de 2016, Joe Bowser <
> bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > > > > escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Merging the nougat_update code today.  Master will now
be
> > targeting
> > > > API
> > > > > > 24.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com
> > > > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yeah, I already added android-24 to that line, and
now the
> > error
> > > is
> > > > > > even
> > > > > > > > more explicit and it's telling me straight up to install
> it.  I
> > > > need
> > > > > > > > someone to install android-24 on Travis.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Jesse <
> > purplecabbage@gmail.com
> > > > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/blob/master/.
> travi
> > > > > s.yml#L9
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> @purplecabbage
> > > > > > > >> risingj.com
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Joe Bowser <
> > bowserj@gmail.com
> > > > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > BTW: The nougat update has been added, but
this broke our
> CI
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > https://travis-ci.org/apache/cordova-android/builds/
> > 156860827
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Can we get android-24 added to Travis?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Joe Bowser
<
> > bowserj@gmail.com
> > > > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > > Sounds good!
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:48 AM, julio
cesar sanchez <
> > > > > > > >> > > jcesarmobile@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >> You asked for a reason to NOT do
it, so if there is no
> > > answer
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > >> can do
> > > > > > > >> > >> it.
> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > > >> > >> 2016-09-01 17:44 GMT+02:00 Joe Bowser
<
> bowserj@gmail.com
> > > > > > > <javascript:;>>:
> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > > >> > >> > BUMP!!!
> > > > > > > >> > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > >> > This is a major version! Are
people getting my
> e-mails?
> > > > > > > >> > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:44
PM, Joe Bowser <
> > > > > > bowserj@gmail.com
> > > > > > > <javascript:;>>
> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > >> > > Hey
> > > > > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >> > > This week, I'm going to
start merging things that
> > will
> > > > > break
> > > > > > > >> certain
> > > > > > > >> > >> > APIs,
> > > > > > > >> > >> > > such as the Third Party
WebView.  This is done so
> we
> > > can
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > >> solid
> > > > > > > >> > >> > > compatibility with Nougat,
as well as fix some
> > > threading
> > > > > > issues
> > > > > > > >> that
> > > > > > > >> > >> > people
> > > > > > > >> > >> > > are having when embedding
CordovaWebView in native
> > > > > projects.
> > > > > > > >> Before
> > > > > > > >> > >> I do
> > > > > > > >> > >> > > this, I need to know whether
there's any reason to
> > NOT
> > > do
> > > > > > this.
> > > > > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >> > > Does anyone have any objections
to me starting to
> > merge
> > > > the
> > > > > > > 6.0.x
> > > > > > > >> > >> changes
> > > > > > > >> > >> > > in and prepping for a
6.0.x release sometime in
> > > September
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > >> > Cordova
> > > > > > > >> > >> > > targeting API 24, and
having compatibility fixes?
> > > > > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >> > > Joe
> > > > > > > >> > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message