cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon MacDonald <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Yet another Cordova-Android 6.0.x release thread, and another 5.x release soon
Date Wed, 25 May 2016 15:52:05 GMT
kk, just making sure.

Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:

> That was a typo.
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Simon MacDonald <
> simon.macdonald@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > LGTM too.
> >
> > Although is "Cordova-Android as a distributable APK" supposed to be
> > "Cordova-Android
> > as a distributable AAR"?
> >
> >
> > Simon Mac Donald
> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > LGTM
> > > I don't think Android N is going to change that much like you said.
> > >
> > > Let's move forward as usual , create a branch 6.x on main repo and
> start
> > > that release stream
> > >
> > > Start landing features from the list below and have a board to track
> was
> > > left. When it's done it's done when ever that's it and we release
> > > regardless of official date of Android N (it might along or be bit
> after)
> > >
> > > And as normal process we need to care and feed both branches (master &
> > > 6.x) having them green and CI testing as Android N builds come out.
> > >
> > > Any plugins need a 6.x branch corresponding to cordova-android@6.x
> > > branch, I don't think so but is good to ask.
> > >
> > > - Carlos
> > > @csantanapr
> > >
> > > > On May 24, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I picked September because it's after when Android N is released.
> The
> > > > items on the list don't depend on each other.
> > > >
> > > > Also, we use semver so us breaking an API or making a major breaking
> > > change
> > > > means a major bump.  Not all of these are API breaking, and in fact
> > only
> > > > the Android Studio project structure and the Thread-Safe bridge
> breaks
> > > > stuff.
> > > >
> > > > I don't want to make a 6.0 and a 7.0 for the two major breaking
> changes
> > > and
> > > > would rather group the two together since they're both related but
> not
> > > > dependent.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Tue, May 24, 2016, 12:58 PM Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Why the Sept. date?
> > > >>
> > > >> Because Android N actually exists in August  sometime, but I don't
> > have
> > > a
> > > >> solid date.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> All these items depend on each other and will take until Sept. to
> get
> > it
> > > >> implemented?
> > > >>
> > > >> No, but
> > > >>
> > > >> Each of them break APIs that required a major bump version?
> > > >>
> > > >> Can we implement one first let's say June call it 6.0 and continue
> > > >> releasing each month or as features get implemented 6.1, 6.2, etc.
.
> > > >>
> > > >> Which will be the first one that make most sense to implement? New
> > > Studio
> > > >> Project?
> > > >>
> > > >> - Carlos
> > > >> @csantanapr
> > > >>
> > > >>> On May 24, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hey
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Since Google IO didn't really throw any new features at us, and
> since
> > > >>> Google hinted at Android N being released at the end of August,
do
> > > people
> > > >>> think that aiming for a Cordova-Android 6.0.x release in September
> > with
> > > >> the
> > > >>> following features makes sense:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * Android Studio project structure
> > > >>> * Android N Multi-Window Support
> > > >>> * Thread-Safe bridge by default
> > > >>> * Cordova-Android as a distributable APK
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I know that we had an earlier thread about this, but now that
IO is
> > > over,
> > > >>> we should probably ramp things up now that we know that we're
not
> > > waiting
> > > >>> until November for a new version of Android to land.  The biggest
> > > change
> > > >> is
> > > >>> the Android Studio project structure, and everything else has
been
> > > >> sitting
> > > >>> in branches for months ready to be merged in.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also, I know a lot of people are waiting for the change to version
> > > >> numbers
> > > >>> where we don't magically generate version numbers for arch-neutral
> > APKs
> > > >> as
> > > >>> well as other script changes to the build, so I think we should
do
> > > >> another
> > > >>> Cordova release to address those issues soon.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thoughts?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Joe
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message