Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE7CB19120 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30422 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2016 00:04:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 30381 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2016 00:04:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 30369 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2016 00:04:55 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:04:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EA28EC0B39 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:04:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EdBnojKKKcgz for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f45.google.com (mail-vk0-f45.google.com [209.85.213.45]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9A50F5F398 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id e6so76805936vkh.2 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:04:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=QO9OGVgRKeI9vmzdrLhjQuayWlFB3Fap6L8vUPYHSF4=; b=CZnd1804INkBHqcYqdAbzFNF651SAKq12qSl6T4uebAGvbapJp7KNRu4o9iNUCnmp4 0QPjK6PyxYWbADPg4B8RQ9p49oenSclSGSBpgmSiXPQZ7VFTFWA8ttMQrX2+T4wjd1Im /CJbnQmMkWh6rGZYb+SBkP0vctwY8PfRJ0Ux7TW48jRCNmJs7AhEiIId8DTSazHqJw3O orEnSFLZ6yzCqBclEaBkz73cURMSzDBBT5hm61kxT88s5fJZ1CnLdc7Z9uIsvK0y9IRr hw/6RHvzw+u/GzXuOqZGNXWZkCKjEYYcTbkjrov+rn2NwFtNdjXbEGLOk+3qK2x7w9Cj nryw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=QO9OGVgRKeI9vmzdrLhjQuayWlFB3Fap6L8vUPYHSF4=; b=O+I3D2ryNqEHRDWRF/4DQYt78xqMFspZR+mfzZckRE2RpZPvaqIuFMSyAn+bI9JbiK yh1C8Fb1zFKp2iSnX8nZ19X7z1d23IKJ48C50dh0Hnzpm2v7ffyx9BnId3Jk4x1OSC0u QxPohx+HjacSGybc2VGQFZV0hBwD1CyVkly9aOjdPUxph5au/GEtXDi8tg6i2CK2NF9t ANVGI/KD7PF1uAm7jAFJxnUsX0ilw+4ZvP3hrC12hbXY+4Gw5aUpvd59OnfkzfBR5gZS Ro3Le6t8YzOWXLE+RkWSXhxlnhhzOj7OklzZv24l+ufTmBwGECMNS5KdQBNvlNbyvUfX pJTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIEpL4w+a6ScxUkWck5alK+zXlkCF57sHNjOwls3Ow67WBFsorT9KgZW5kXBJFS/mAKpzKoHqJCXL0OmA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.132.140 with SMTP id g134mr6051393vkd.94.1458864291761; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.176.65.73 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:04:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:04:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BUG] CB-10944 NoSuchMethodError in InAppBrowser plugin From: Joe Bowser To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1145886ee3044a052ed44fbe --001a1145886ee3044a052ed44fbe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Was this really necessary? On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Jesse wrote: > The CI uses emulators, so this in an AVD running KitKat. > I know you hate the android emulator Joe, but that is probably the repro > step you need. > > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Joe Bowser wrote: > > > I managed to get a repro on a Jellybean device. > > > > BTW: Nexus devices can be downgraded in a pinch, but I usually test my > > KitKat stuff on a Moto E, because it's cheap. > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Richard Knoll > > wrote: > > > > > Yep, I'm sure. I double-checked just now to verify and the > > > cordova-android-osx AVD is definitely running KitKat. I was also able > to > > > reproduce this on a Jellybean device and a KitKat emulator locally wi= th > > the > > > mobilespec auto tests. I don't have an actual KitKat device on hand, > > though. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Richard > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bowserj@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 10:41 AM > > > To: dev > > > Subject: Re: [BUG] CB-10944 NoSuchMethodError in InAppBrowser plugin > > > > > > Are you sure? I couldn't reproduce this on my KitKat devices, or my > > > Jellybean Devices. I had to dig up a Moto RAZR running 4.0.3 to see > this > > > bug happen. > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Richard Knoll > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Both of the Android CI builders run KitKat. We should probably > > > > document that somewhere or have medic print it out; I'll look into > > doing > > > that. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bowserj@gmail.com] > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 8:43 AM > > > > To: dev > > > > Subject: Re: [BUG] CB-10944 NoSuchMethodError in InAppBrowser plugi= n > > > > > > > > Seriously, it would be super helpful to know which version of Andro= id > > > > this failure happened on. I'm having a really difficult time tryin= g > > > > to reproduce this bug, and I'm not keen on just throwing things at > the > > > > CI to see what passes. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Joe Bowser > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Well, that's an easy fix, but it would be helpful to know which A= VD > > > > > is failing, since I have no idea which version of getDrawable() i= s > > > > > falling apart. > > > > > > > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttp%3a%2f%2fstac > > > > > ko > > > > > verflow.com > %2fquestions%2f30266971%2fwhy-getdrawable-doesnt-work-on- > > > > > so > > > > > me-android-devices&data=3D01%7c01%7criknoll%40microsoft.com > %7c2ea8dcd3 > > > > > d9 > > > > > > 10419c401208d353faf1d6%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=3D > > > > > Vy g7%2bB1J3YlK0jvy4NyhgsFt62b8FXCV607V5m6vwLY%3d > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Dmitry Blotsky > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hey folks, > > > > >> > > > > >> There=E2=80=99s a crash in the InAppBrowser plugin breaking the = CI builds. > > > JIRA: > > > > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttps%3a%2f%2fis > > > > >> su > > > > >> es.apache.org > %2fjira%2fbrowse%2fCB-10944.&data=3D01%7c01%7criknoll%40 > > > > >> mi > > > > >> crosoft.com > %7c2ea8dcd3d910419c401208d353faf1d6%7c72f988bf86f141af91 > > > > >> ab > > > > >> > 2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=3DOwCRnauGzyWnPMZEBLEanP%2fQLqaVqfRl22KX8WtecQ > > > > >> A% > > > > >> 3d > > > > >> > > > > >> Kindly, > > > > >> Dmitry > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org > > > > > > --001a1145886ee3044a052ed44fbe--