Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHYtTqku7nLjbUC-4Kuk3iW0USO7ciaSWUCaQgJgef3HpdM-ww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <75B10179-B6EA-4673-A623-C7D0E5510FD3@microsoft.com>
	<CAHYtTqku7nLjbUC-4Kuk3iW0USO7ciaSWUCaQgJgef3HpdM-ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:56:01 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAKP6k2umtKv3PCUpSyzxAX4LsSKhkzD1YNZZX0tOEma1HXR7Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Node versions on Travis and Appveyor
From: Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d53121f4cf10529c9606a

--001a113d53121f4cf10529c9606a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+1 to expanding coverage, but we should stick to stable versions as Carlos
notes.


@purplecabbage
risingj.com

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com>
wrote:

> What about node 4.0? That's the LTS (i.e. stable) version
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:42 AM Dmitry Blotsky <dblotsky@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Richard and I came across a discrepancy today where some cordova-lib
> tests
> > were failing on  a local machine but not on Travis or Appveyor, and we
> > figured it was likely due to different Node versions (0.12 vs. 5.0).
> >
> > Are there any objections to expanding our coverage on Travis and Appveyor
> > to run on both Node 0.12 and 5.0?
> >
> > Kindly,
> > Dmitry
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
> >
> >
>

--001a113d53121f4cf10529c9606a--