cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] cordova-ios-4.x release (for real)
Date Wed, 02 Dec 2015 07:49:59 GMT
>> Or should I just let it fail still?
It depends how long it'll be until we fix them.  The build will be broken
in the CI until it is fixed so probably marking them as pending is the
better option.


@purplecabbage
risingj.com

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:

> Couldn't wait. All file-transfer specs now pass for uiwebview and
> wkwebview.
>
> For those two WKWebView tests that are failing, but are expected to
> fail -- I'll try to modify the tests to mark the test as pending if
> the platform is iOS and the WKWebView bridge is found.
>
> Or should I just let it fail still?
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks! - yeah after I posted it, of course I realized it is all open
> > source (duh) and I can run a local server or throw it on a
> > digitalocean instance or something :)
> > I'll do that tomorrow...
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> For a second I read "the bar is clear", but then I went to my fridge and
> >> saw I still have some beer left :-)
> >>
> >> How long before the INFRA provides the VM for the file transfer, I
> looked
> >> the JIRA and it mentioned something like "complete" and "we are in
> holding
> >> because of capacity" in the same comment, and I was like stupid because
> I
> >> didn't understand :-(
> >>
> >> If it's going to take a long time, can we do the test with a local
> machine
> >> and vet that it works?
> >>
> >> For local xhr loading, I left a comment in the JIRA.  I don't think it's
> >> need it but I'm curios on how local xhr loading works when fetching
> normal
> >> files on a web app, meaning dynamically loading js, css, html in SPA
> using
> >> a typical js framework like angular, etc..
> >>
> >> Platform API is [5], I think is nice to have but not required for the
> 4.0
> >> release.
> >>
> >> Oh by the way GREAT PROGRESS !!! and I cheers , I'm having a beer now.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:38 PM Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The board is almost clear [1].
> >>>
> >>> UIWebView mobile-spec passes, just waiting for INFRA-10831 [2] for the
> >>> file-transfer tests.
> >>> Ditto for WKWebView, it essentially just fails two tests, which are
> >>> expected [3]
> >>> (filed a feature request issue [4] for local xhr loading, if needed).
> >>>
> >>> Platform API [4] could go in this release as well, what do you think?
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=76
> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10831
> >>> [3]
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7287?focusedCommentId=15034831&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15034831
> >>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10109
> >>> [5] https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/176
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message