Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9FC518006 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53759 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2015 16:59:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 53717 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2015 16:59:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 53704 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2015 16:59:08 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:59:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A8066C39C8 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:59:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.536 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.536 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.345, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.b=oDT8QiNC; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.b=ldqsojHi Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m3yfsjMo2PlH for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com (mail-qk0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B7A0020D14 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qkao63 with SMTP id o63so1279794qka.2 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:58:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=hmT1OHO3gLahehMkK/yie5PCh0vgewj2YkCSnwoLIwQ=; b=ldqsojHiiZ5iH43w+m7QmjuM9ZuJ6A7MXyEHkBCr2eD+IFF8cQgFaYnlLjSj3HKSw6 gRfmBB+BJtrOAh7RK19Ln7K1IwJDfD4EcK1b1+rOf0uE26uxFIM02pkxeie0pFpi63Gw ePo6sbiqSD7szamDmoWo6VhrAD8Vd6XT8REiM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=hmT1OHO3gLahehMkK/yie5PCh0vgewj2YkCSnwoLIwQ=; b=hOtZah3dfRs2alQMYxZuJsjlMPaIuGObyoEGuO+yhBCSHh9pGdh1b41qj/+Z/+pCBH x9LAK6dveaeMNa2GwiTlhQ1/NwxtVogXpUjNdZKnUQ8wjjBYP9pygntdb3KtW3IcZH+L 4Hv9/2uplcZRPjpOgxTZBoUVBT3N1ceE9uCj9af8KndmnDo7fPQiVBxYI3hSgPJ5RjAx 7Hk20NwqYLVjOpXyIczkjl058DhLfDrDrpOZaGoo46lQ5ba2oav6RDpVxaHGWOSKfsqz 9u+Z5TwjqDEvVuRS4Ymv3x7g1VMv6w0uOYyO1P+YpEntlddbIpqZkAsDva/2FjfT6oIE YqRA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmS957Ku3UYzDgKBM9Zgl2D36k7jM1m2RjLAWmzq2HWix+MkUw3fT90K/dBA5kkGMeh7O8S X-Received: by 10.55.73.210 with SMTP id w201mr5528287qka.39.1447174737703; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:58:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: agrieve@google.com Received: by 10.140.86.9 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:58:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrew Grieve Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:58:38 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PwdISVoVcMIwKdAWffMWJAb_PFA Message-ID: Subject: Re: Plugin Audit 2015 To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114aa1362b8fdd052432a062 --001a114aa1362b8fdd052432a062 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Nice work! Couldn't resist checking out the results of the thought-it-would-never-happen audit :). On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Raymond Camden wrote: > "Globalization (make sync" > > YES, YES, YES! > > (Sorry, but that makes me *very* happy to hear!) > > "Dialogs (Should use HTML/CS/JS dialogs instead)" > > Strongly no, but I'm assuming there is a good reason for this beyond > just what is listed in the parenthesis. Yes, UI frameworks normally > have their own dialog widgets, but the fact that I can use a device > standard dialog is a big plus for me. I'll even use it over Ionic's > even when inside an Ionic app. > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Steven Gill > wrote: > > Jesse, Simon and I spent sometime doing a plugin audit. Our > recommendations > > can be found at https://github.com/cordova/cordova-discuss/pull/28 > > > > Overview: > > > https://github.com/stevengill/cordova-discuss/blob/master/proposals/PluginsAudit2015/overview.md > > > > Please give us feedback! > > > > -Steve > > > > -- > =========================================================================== > Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM > > Email : raymondcamden@gmail.com > Blog : www.raymondcamden.com > Twitter: raymondcamden > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org > > --001a114aa1362b8fdd052432a062--