Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D52F1899A for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21064 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2015 20:44:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 21023 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2015 20:44:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 21011 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2015 20:44:48 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:44:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6178FC0BE5 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:44:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.879 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VuvlOQV9xeSf for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com (mail-oi0-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 86A83429AA for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oiad129 with SMTP id d129so8642802oia.0 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:44:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=IXwU/4yeJhp18GVWUFbIrMcGP3jL/HSBJAYbf4S1r0A=; b=vQKJk1rPAfbcy3J3778/RGCshtGd88BFxRGZl+w3NoY7d6tGUspj8MFqidKjKgamhW SYpwqSmSNMB6BbiU6eVJjUOtzFOWt7b2210tcFTX9iyxRAqEGnJHv9m8PHlwnS1TdO49 yrQ1JnXP42z2F5J/Eear0A0lg9nBX0VmWtTIX39lsNkZc6tXKL6Zwg1meV0VqhhbYmsY 7iygmPEiLrYOc6Hc5ZDRBYT6kNE9ASuYNbcSxhI/jsNHfmUi9eHtNu/3Jrs+VWJDzX2j Fd1qXejz6kVI2BJ23OmvduGVbvr3DTVU+nLxq38uFAgRgOnmjgX7+cxZHW2VcirEcew8 MK7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.80.67 with SMTP id e64mr10637068oib.125.1445028280906; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.98.195 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:44:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <682A926F-D8A9-4BC2-9669-962C626A5EF3@microsoft.com> References: <682A926F-D8A9-4BC2-9669-962C626A5EF3@microsoft.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:44:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Curating Apps From: Joe Bowser To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d843e5fbc9f05223edde0 --001a113d843e5fbc9f05223edde0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, I definitely think we should be curating the apps to make sure they're legit. On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Dmitry Blotsky wrote: > Hey folks, > > Just a quick thought: should we be curating the apps in the showcase to > make sure they=E2=80=99re legit? I verify that they=E2=80=99re on an app = store, but the > Android app store has no curation. > > Kindly, > Dmitry --001a113d843e5fbc9f05223edde0--