Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CE0218697 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2400 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2015 20:32:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 2360 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2015 20:32:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 2224 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2015 20:32:50 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 20:32:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3B9AB1A6BC4 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:32:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.88 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JVckDQv70Nh2 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com (mail-ob0-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4B61C43BB0 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obdbs4 with SMTP id bs4so158775514obd.3 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:32:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=4ZhKSlNjFwtCXWXQwyIdYnT9NFuhZZIv8ZiscLeaJVU=; b=lUY3bPHwMIJ1EArsdkcExIV6/6akn7NZ7+9QME7iojIDVuJaF6COQls+7HkXadLLi+ wf6wLVDkdMIRo3bIPYIxx34srnniv5EmDabUfe770U1zHbofNIin6q13Ku9gtCSCFF2/ netXf8pxmBcrj47uamUdpNJo+5YGFADyBlC/dqmhKkZL87tLXfgtbmZYQMPKZQjpFtFN P7aY3wou8sMRF5w1EVoaPlxkdQ31qPD/20GHvHwuN2UdkA3xO91E18xxoyPExR8Z1D11 N2e7FQnYGf/vW1T307k0IShWax59kHayH5OfjZ/PnmaxIqHCjFajP4PJA3WBVSFpbrOv o0MA== X-Received: by 10.202.52.138 with SMTP id b132mr10857300oia.125.1436387564891; Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:32:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Joe Bowser Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 20:32:35 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Android] Camera Plugin Request To: dev@cordova.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d3e0290b5ff051a630a14 --001a113d3e0290b5ff051a630a14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 That makes sense. I'll whitelist the Content URI and see if that resolves the issue. I do think we need something to get real URIs on Android but this seems like the wrong place for it. On Wed, Jul 8, 2015, 1:21 PM Nikhil Khandelwal wrote: > I remember seeing a PR, that mentioned content:// was not working because > of the whitelist plugin not supporting it when '*' was specified and/or > because CSP did not include it. That PR and discussion did not go anywhere: > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-whitelist/pull/6 > > I have myself not tried the scenarios here and I wonder if they are > related. > > Thanks, > Nikhil > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bowserj@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 11:42 AM > To: dev > Subject: [Android] Camera Plugin Request > > Hey > > Since for some reason the browser doesn't resolve content URIs anymore, > I'm tempted to pull this into Camera. > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-camera/pull/93 > > The problem I have with it is the large amount of code that is being > added, and I want some more people to look at it before I OK it. If that > could happen, that'd be awesome. > > Thanks > --001a113d3e0290b5ff051a630a14--