Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8609E108D6 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32260 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2014 15:42:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 32220 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2014 15:42:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 32203 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2014 15:42:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:42:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mmocny@google.com designates 209.85.220.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.178] (HELO mail-vc0-f178.google.com) (209.85.220.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:42:06 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hq11so2233842vcb.23 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:40:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=c8WMf+9z0IJITHC7PVmFHhd4f7juBVXb3lUaIje/RzI=; b=gX7Z7uW1z4NscGfrrx8DIZRbw4KTQ2WtLFxenwEFMk85N7RK5xR/Mjun+ElYJzcqci qT8280TC27EbqzAYpgHe3qV07FAC3NLZ/HsyY9psFFWGOf4SkgNwwwGi1GYaWlBrjzGW ZF//lbiuvkGO4ztW5pNqEdwcTmnvIADAtstcGLNuWCQaU2OaZEm7txUxooE03psCA2Ns LliGN3MPn0Idv2lZtREB3etB7Bb44fULoZ9o/jA8XfIEsPC017897W+z0N9ovV6oNC8A wYTUskLh4eewegTn2zA2yiBpBsCKGSdbQQGCkFbhAJslhLnc8aavjOeoByorEOczAwRJ gxhQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=c8WMf+9z0IJITHC7PVmFHhd4f7juBVXb3lUaIje/RzI=; b=AcFHV8Y4/yH1oUXVSH2laHyEVumzKuWsLdQ0jVAgoK/VyJ7DBLooMfS7X3Ow3CNQTn hc1Mv0ThoAvs/x0L37tfnliIbTpJKjPatYLFatYPREMK24rrk0rkktv+X7fVEib1+4dq uEz3v8ArkxcDwTx9/LKA/LBjEzfASeG0AubvE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=c8WMf+9z0IJITHC7PVmFHhd4f7juBVXb3lUaIje/RzI=; b=A8tb5elN/PtLYp0ZKiYN4tU83ASemy3a3NZXy4/6DlVWeomfOj5fvXoeRvCaLLIeSd WUN5wVFtGB1KxkRz9+rtmhnUECT2KQ4ZT4NzK/Bc+g7e05EuUel2mD0ZT3ytUgTOoCJI pSOD/OLj3XRUeULgv7wuCUzsaj9MeiaK51mO/K9Vjh+58chiZNkCX9c9Ynz3AmEG85tQ xjU1awHcJO5qr5/WRKbY3bt+BCHsyauDf/DP402Ug/iSKsIgOd0qykIkJhuQbDVOL+Ij 9Hv4oBLYYVXRS9Gfxd2xeDFtcPmjagU6KYTYIaPjQ3hnRkHAeFOTtCV7cC9KGE5n5YRo 4Iag== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkON3brP4QNIDcgGWxogHIL0PEstOn4OGgRcxZOuYSjPncLi+zXjhq+OmaMylIEiNpUEfmi X-Received: by 10.52.58.169 with SMTP id s9mr21237608vdq.15.1418053235580; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:40:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: mmocny@google.com Received: by 10.52.135.212 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:40:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Michal Mocny Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:40:15 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Luu0K1SBFIj8x8G_qdnr6l5EK-Q Message-ID: Subject: Re: Code Review Plz To: dev Cc: Andrew Grieve Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11364926613f8f0509b63f33 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11364926613f8f0509b63f33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sorry didn't answer. I looked a week ago and liked the design and rationale, but don't have existing apps actually using the feature to test on. On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > I'll take a look on Monday. Spent this week bashing my head against my desk > trying to deal with the MozillaView js. > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014, 1:12 PM Andrew Grieve wrote: > > > Will go ahead with this next week if no one has a look. That said, would > > love a look. > > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Andrew Grieve > > wrote: > > > > > I've taken a stab at refactoring Android's splashscreen logic into the > > > splashscreen plugin. > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/134 > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-splashscreen/pull/32 > > > > > > In order to be backwards-compatible, I've: > > > - Committed a copy of the plugin to cordova-android and registered it > > > where App is registered > > > - Made the new code in the actual plugin disabled if it detects > > > cordova-android < 4.0 > > > > > > > > > I've also deprecated splash-screen related things within > CordovaActivity, > > > because I don't think the Activity needs explicit logic in it for > splash > > > screens now that its a proper plugin (plus, you can do everything with > > > config.xml or CordovaPreferences). > > > > > > My thinking is to delete the deprecated things when I merge into the > > > 4.0.x, and to also remove the bundled copy of the plugin. > > > > > > To test this, I've enabled the splashscreen on Android in mobilespec. > For > > > the life of me I couldn't get the instruments test in cordova-android > to > > > run. My Eclipse doesn't boot, Android Studio does an awful job > importing > > > it, and the command-line instructions in the README yield: > > > [aapt] invalid resource directory name: > > > /Users/agrieve/git/cordova/cordova-android/test/bin/res/crunch > > > > > > ugh! Certainly it'd be worth getting these working, but I think > > mobilespec > > > is a better test for this anyways since I could test with & without the > > > plugin installed. > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > --001a11364926613f8f0509b63f33--