Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FA3210979 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79339 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2014 15:54:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 79300 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2014 15:54:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 79287 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2014 15:54:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:54:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mmocny@google.com designates 209.85.220.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.174] (HELO mail-vc0-f174.google.com) (209.85.220.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:54:24 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id id10so2197370vcb.5 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:52:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=YPr1mPIQyr2mriNtP2wmS/UECEmz36UjCoaUl9n6zU4=; b=oPTOErjY7c3+57qbfRA8/xG76sjSeuL99yQVqqaxPXX8ZitQIgfOQjHsuKLbFwzcv7 QoI2CyTF2Gghr0M/9RBRLsnKsMJCOiUNct+doNkBRbcakGrm2qhWSSydFJ9xfDRa9dbr Co5aq+3CCYHhCeNb7m3VlFtHCogK1mlHxcrvFKniRhvw4c09nSTOg7bzTwtSbdM0xWHu SfKEvUSQLJvJRTIZbWI0+tPz71qwVy66CtPhZbp7kablsPu2H4FUN/YTK2gSfz2i/gov hoEacJkY6AA353T+UI6nsQgMyY6tFbyJYUEqNICuMGbW5Ii/Jn8mTLlycYYrxb7X7OnZ +I/g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=YPr1mPIQyr2mriNtP2wmS/UECEmz36UjCoaUl9n6zU4=; b=W+oQF6w1ssM7Y5DDKmZ0PADIEN3HeX9mOiIZqLYQS6a4gYUGu/8Ln67tyUg8YZ5G53 fjN/7oRgYlNohklLirS/ZULKDnLfDID6N3Nge2yvdHCIMq+D0W8vRkPJqA7WctUNPjVr wCNqo0K4WpKLthrWDubbJMjd6V32Blwl6flv4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=YPr1mPIQyr2mriNtP2wmS/UECEmz36UjCoaUl9n6zU4=; b=MeDuQD0cw/4+UxwQ1Q07paC/xmRU0psX685H8z9ceaf+9OOEz5EEY3ve8n/vLYtXbf 0uy0TjS1rUTIRi+zj7v00kLNbEfkf9gSfElholVa3oHcemrINrJiMLdFpzHnXZtRmh7A IV4uPxnn39dTQTDrMN1zejRoKIVi4CRtxTOJv96r2IA/dOnh7jZpnBBg4NZQ4LRsh04q LWh7+l2k47h+78N+ia4x5Pci8khOtIf4p+zksrct5WypzUrXQPNehCfGDksvKAME60Jp UxhDTS6YHBb54Uk/b/8mi+pfE6XzZWJUEtn5jG6lm/hPZxefkoqk6DXweryYJQ7VtBFV fFaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkfX/es1oybUmIz64nzbPHfMA4pbiwOK9F9SvomcG8BkKwMLjBpT1baXG8YzSzLt2j+FEw6 X-Received: by 10.52.139.68 with SMTP id qw4mr19613705vdb.70.1418053973145; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:52:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: mmocny@google.com Received: by 10.52.135.212 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 07:52:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Michal Mocny Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:52:32 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -_X5-hCAjIrn083XVPg-1AWo4z8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 4.0 Sprint Tasks (Another "Hey, let's ship 4.0.x soon" post) To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52d598d57929a0509b66bfc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec52d598d57929a0509b66bfc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > Hey > > After messing with the JS for a week, I decided for now to stop work on > MozillaView. I think I've managed to prove that the concept is at least > possible, but I really feel that it's still too unstable to actually show > past a demo/POC at this time. We've definitely learned some lessons, and > I'll probably write a blog post on them soon, and pick up work in the new > year. > > That said, we should really concentrate on shipping 4.0 in January, we > should do the following: > > 1. Bump up the targeted version to 5.0 > Yes, please. > 2. Allow for users to target KitKat for Quirks Mode (I'm not kidding, > Quirks mode is back. Chrome is the new IE! WTF MAN!) > Quirks mode is for targetSdk 18 or lower running on KitKat (19) or newer devices. This is because the default WebView changed dramatically from 18->19 and Android tries to have a good compatibility story. Not sure whats so WTF about that? Anyway, are you suggesting that we need to support enabling quirks mode even with targetSdk 19+ (as has been the cordova-android default for a while now, anyway)? > 3. Get the gradle work in. MUCH FASTER! LESS SPAM! WOW! > Do we want to add this next year in 4.0 or ship this year in 3.7 (behind a flag, maybe)? > 4. Get the JUnit tests working with Gradle/Android Studio. I don't think > this is a 4.0 task per-se, but we should do it right after 4.0 is released. > 5. Stare at the pie chart wishing that 9 was 5. (Anyone who knows our > deprecation policies knows EXACTLY what I'm talking about). > > I do have one API change I want to make. I want to rename the > CordovaWebView interface CordovaWebInterface so that it's obvious that it's > an interface. Since people using the old CordovaWebView embedded feature > are going to have to do a find/replace on the XML, this doesn't really > matter. Of course, the people using this feature may beg to differ. If > you're using this feature, and you care about it still working with your > current code, PLEASE TEST 4.0 NOW. > > Thoughts? > > Joe > --bcaec52d598d57929a0509b66bfc--